Literally and figuratively.
His cawk pic got removed and he got disabled.
Who actually cares.
That would be like people caring when he was posting.
Why would one.
I care because I'm not sure that that pic was pornographic enough to warrant a kneecapping.
In your own objective opinion, what would be your verdict?
In my own objective opinion I don't give a flying fuck if he wants to post pictures of male genitalia.
However I can see how if it breaches the rules of the board he posted it on, fair do's. One lives by those rules or does something else.
That is maybe biased by the fact that I would never feel the same urge to shock. Maybe I don't crave reaction to the same pathetic extent.
The half-arsed, bedwards kinda issue I was tryna highlight was that there's a difference between the male member flacid and the male member rampant.
Haven't we seen dormant John Thomas's posted in the past with nary a sideways glance.
But as soon as some cunt puts a pair of googly eyes on said cawk, it's fucking get the fuck out of my living room time.
Anyway, I'm talking bawls. Bed.