That's what we have:
MSNBC vs. Foxnews, ftw.
en(un)lightened
That's what we have:
MSNBC vs. Foxnews, ftw.
"Researchers have already cast much darkness on the subject, and if they continue their investigations, we shall soon know nothing at all about it."
-Mark Twain
ヽ(゜▽、゜)ノ
You also have to add Glenn Beck and Lou Dobbs, both of whom are strongly against Liberals and get considerably more ratings than a segment on MSNBC does.
Computing two biases in television against another doesn't make it fair. Look at the owners of these companies and their share of newpapers and other articles across the country and where they're placed.
en(un)lightened
Oh, granted, but I'm only positing that we have these formulations in place already.
The really funny part (to me, anyway) is any (re)iteration of the fairness doctrine would require libs to come clean on their current "oh, but we're mainstream" cover and assume their proper position.
"Researchers have already cast much darkness on the subject, and if they continue their investigations, we shall soon know nothing at all about it."
-Mark Twain
Shovel Ready
I feel like I'm missing something here.
The whole point of the thread, actually.
Liberals should come clean but Fox News gets to claim it's "fair and balanced"?
"I am the one who knocks."- Heisenberg
en(un)lightened
Originally Posted by clocker
Not at all.
Satisfactory fairness can be achieved simply by having MSNBC make a claim similar to Fox's.
"Researchers have already cast much darkness on the subject, and if they continue their investigations, we shall soon know nothing at all about it."
-Mark Twain
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks