I'd assume every site that's been as sensationalized as FTN has been has some bad apples in it. If you can't realize that then you should skip over threads like this.
I think the collective opinion of the user base and staff is that speeds and file retention could fair to be a bit better.Originally Posted by AkaiDoresu
FTN has made it clear that it wants no part of competition with other sites, but there's no harm in a comparison, and there is definitely no harm in improvements; there's no reason to not improve file speeds and retention.
they didn't built Rome in one day
omfg ftn suxez so badz! its the shittiest site in the history of the interwebz!!!11
.
.
.
.
Stfu, you no good cawk suckers. I would bet that anyone saying bad things about ftn is some frustrated wanker with no account. I haven't used any other tracker besides ftn, for at least 4-5 months (except tt and what.cd) and I can say I'm more than pleased with it. The best torrenting experience is offered by ftn+zerosec.ws
It just like another tracker xcept its been around longer .....
BLAH
FTN is at the very top of my bookmarks. There are no other scene sites below it.
Are there really no seed time rules atm? They still go pink in your profile if you haven't seeded for 2 days.
As for packs, uploaders have gotten tired of doing them. I couldn't care less, since the whole pack fanaticism is pretty lame.
FTN got worst after the server issue.They claim that they will change something in the site,eagerly waiting.
Bookmarks