View Poll Results: Which do you use (like better)?

Voters
166. You may not vote on this poll
  • utorrent

    124 74.70%
  • vuze

    42 25.30%
Page 2 of 9 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 84

Thread: Vuze vs. utorrent

  1. #11
    b3owulf's Avatar facepalm.jpg
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Vilnius
    Age
    34
    Posts
    336
    Quote Originally Posted by harshytkage View Post
    those who say vuze is a JAVA power eating monster(or anything like that) don't know what they're missing out on...utorrent is an excuse for anyone who has a P1 or lower...bah! humbug!
    Ok, mine post was too much, yeah, but! Vuze is no longer BT-Client, it's has too much for ME. It's like Nero: 1st versions were brilliant, just Burning ROM and no crap, but look at it now, huh? It's.... I think Nero 10 will be operating system LOL And now Vuze, it's can do too much, and I want ONLY powerful BT client, so, my choice is uTorrent.

  2. BitTorrent   -   #12
    bentomans's Avatar Poster BT Rep: +2
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    91
    i use utorrent because it's easy to use and it's light on resource

  3. BitTorrent   -   #13
    i hated azureus now i hate vuze so complicated and requires java which i hate more than both of them lol

  4. BitTorrent   -   #14
    hasu's Avatar * 3 Terabyte * BT Rep: +1
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    pacific
    Posts
    549
    vuze?? no idea. i don't use vuze ever.
    -= Do not just say "it doesn't work!" =-
    my the oldest tracker - Join date 2005-07 (
    284 weeks ago)




  5. BitTorrent   -   #15
    Night0wl's Avatar GoaHead BT Rep: +6BT Rep +6
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    On an island
    Age
    45
    Posts
    1,525
    I use Vuze on classic interface.

  6. BitTorrent   -   #16
    Vuze is unquestionably the superior client, but it's better suited to the more technically savvy user.

  7. BitTorrent   -   #17
    Ahmed047's Avatar cardiologist BT Rep: +3
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    S el-K
    Posts
    385
    Quote Originally Posted by bentomans View Post
    it's light on resource
    yes ,this is the main advantage of Utorrent ,Vuze is a heavy program .
    Last edited by Ahmed047; 03-08-2009 at 03:37 PM.

  8. BitTorrent   -   #18
    harshytkage's Avatar Tarders BEWARE! BT Rep: +2
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Hisar (Dont Bother)
    Posts
    391
    Quote Originally Posted by b3owulf View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by harshytkage View Post
    those who say vuze is a JAVA power eating monster(or anything like that) don't know what they're missing out on...utorrent is an excuse for anyone who has a P1 or lower...bah! humbug!
    Ok, mine post was too much, yeah, but! Vuze is no longer BT-Client, it's has too much for ME. It's like Nero: 1st versions were brilliant, just Burning ROM and no crap, but look at it now, huh? It's.... I think Nero 10 will be operating system LOL And now Vuze, it's can do too much, and I want ONLY powerful BT client, so, my choice is uTorrent.
    ummm...sorry to burst your bubble....but nero 10 has been out for a while now...
    Spoiler: Show

  9. BitTorrent   -   #19
    Polarbear's Avatar deep funk BT Rep: +5
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    behind the turntables
    Age
    53
    Posts
    2,662
    Quote Originally Posted by Night0wl View Post
    I use Vuze on classic interface.
    Quote Originally Posted by Unstable1 View Post
    Vuze is unquestionably the superior client, but it's better suited to the more technically savvy user.
    true that. many people don't know about the classic mode which simply turns off all the vuze features and some are simply overstrained with the right settings and advanced features.

    another advantage is that the client is open source and there's a huge variety of helpful plugins.

    the often mentioned ressource hog argument doesn't count for me by the way. vuze uses about 120mb ram and 5% cpu with hundreds of torrents running on my system. i really can afford that for an essential application.

    to be fair i can't really compare the two clients because i never used utorrent. the mac version still is very basic and doesn't even support torrent creation. it's no alternative.

  10. BitTorrent   -   #20
    harshytkage's Avatar Tarders BEWARE! BT Rep: +2
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Hisar (Dont Bother)
    Posts
    391
    @polar-
    dude! you have a mac! i feel so sorry for you...
    just jk!
    Spoiler: Show

Page 2 of 9 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •