Nav 2004 Pro Vs. Syamntec Av Corp 8.0

**razorsharp013** · 09-21-2003, 05:17 PM

Hey.
I'm currently using Symantec AV Corp. 8.00.9374 and am downloading the new NAV Pro as I am writing this. So is it worth the long dl, or am I better off sticking with what I have?
What do you guys think?

**sharedholder** · 09-21-2003, 05:19 PM

Originally posted by razorsharp013@21 September 2003 - 17:17
Hey.
I'm currently using Symantec AV Corp. 8.00.9374 and am downloading the new NAV Pro as I am writing this. So is it worth the long dl, or am I better off sticking with what I have?
What do you guys think?

Stick with Corp.

**zapjb** · 09-21-2003, 05:36 PM

Rely on SH's advice.

**Amarjit** · 09-21-2003, 05:41 PM

I've never used Corporate but I think Norton AntiVirus 2004 Professional is very good indeed.

VB · 09-21-2003, 07:09 PM

Keep your corporate version.

**asmithz** · 09-21-2003, 07:11 PM

Norton corp is faster and more relible, stick with corp.

**skelley521** · 09-21-2003, 08:27 PM

I had symantec corp 8.1; Nod32; and panda antivirues all installed and all were updated. I did a full system scan with each and they found nothing. I had nortons 2004 and thought I would give it a go. It detected a virus in my windows system folder (system 32 folder) called sys.exe. It said it was in use and could not be removed so I manually removed it in safemode.
So why did 2004 detect this virus when none of the others would??

Steve