Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 45

Thread: infiltrated private trackers to avoid?!?!

  1. #31
    Quote Originally Posted by Raban View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by TinkerBell View Post
    Can I ask a simple question. Is the only proof that tl was infiltrated
    TL is 100% infiltrated ... its a fact not speculation ... they have various MPAA type orgs on there... it isn't questioned....
    Wow, you mean all the accounts there belong to MPAA/RIAA etc?


    U2VjdGlvbjQ3

  2. BitTorrent   -   #32
    thishead's Avatar Member BT Rep: +6BT Rep +6
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    27
    Quote Originally Posted by Qlix View Post
    All trackers are infiltrated. THE END.
    wow lots of speculation...

    when i got a letter from my isp it specifically listed a file i know came from TL.

    I assume that when you get a letter from your isp all the letters must include filenames.

    Like most people im a member of a few 0day trackers. some like TL have snatchlists so it makes it easier to remember whats been leeched

    if youve received a letter or know someone personally that has and he/she can connect the tracker to the file that info would be helpful to me because i really want to avoid another letter. nor would i want an invite to that kinda site regardless of pretimes/speed/ratio.

    and even if you havent got a letter from your isp most private trackers have forums where these things are discussed.

    it seems to me that this info would be extremely important to the sticky "what trackers are worth....

    im starting to think like an earlier poster who said rapidshit an megaupload r the way to go. when it comes to porn i hardly ever use torrents anymore. but its also hard to find forums with more than 1 mirror too. if i cant get scenes with one url i usually skip it.

  3. BitTorrent   -   #33
    Louie's Avatar Poster BT Rep: +1
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Elephant's Graveyard
    Posts
    514
    aproximating?
    You're close,either you say all member are potential spies either give some random numbers regarding spies,none of them can make a clear point about their number and location.

    people seem to think that anti-p2p company employees are idiots or something. remember, these people have the permission of the copyright owners to transfer their data with no fear of prosecution. they can easily rent a seedbox at ovh or server.lu every month and boost their ratios on sites. they can post ratio proofs just like anyone else, chat on irc, and appear to be genuine filesharers. I'm sure many of them are, especially since that is their job
    .

    Exactly,now if they would want to act against of someone would done it by now.
    Last edited by Louie; 06-18-2009 at 09:52 AM.

    Keep your signature in old sanskrit please.

  4. BitTorrent   -   #34
    All trackers that you can pay(or trade,whatever etc) for in order to get in are infiltrated.And that's basically all trackers. You don't have to pay a huge sum in order to get into high-level trackers, and once you got one, it's pretty easy to scam/trade/buy another. So, WHY THE FUCK wouldn't they be at the most trackers? It doesn't have to be noticed, because (at least here in sweden) Anti-piracy-organisations often work for specific clients that have produced something that they wan't to protect, so it's not until that production shows up on the tracker people will be caught. If it doesn't show up, then noone will be caught and they won't be noticed until another production that needs protection shows up.

    If you're scared, get a fucking VPN or something. Stop cry.

    If FBI can infiltrate the scene, why wouldn't anti-piracy-organisations be able to infiltrate private trackers?

  5. BitTorrent   -   #35
    cinephilia's Avatar I don't like you BT Rep: +10BT Rep +10
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    behind you
    Posts
    5,158
    Quote Originally Posted by The_Martinator View Post
    lol, when people invite other people to harder to get into trackers they usually know them better, thus it's harder (not impossible) for the anti-p2p to infiltrate them.
    above all, there would be no point in targeting small communities while "factories" like TL, ScT, SCC etc are spending happy days.
    whenever people agree with me, i always feel i must be wrong.

  6. BitTorrent   -   #36
    The_Martinator's Avatar I is posting MACHINE BT Rep: +6BT Rep +6
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    I is everywhere!!
    Age
    36
    Posts
    2,598
    Quote Originally Posted by cinephilia View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by The_Martinator View Post
    lol, when people invite other people to harder to get into trackers they usually know them better, thus it's harder (not impossible) for the anti-p2p to infiltrate them.
    above all, there would be no point in targeting small communities while "factories" like TL, ScT, SCC etc are spending happy days.
    Also there's that. Again pure stats. when you infiltrate TL, you're looking at big profits even if you catch only a small percentage of people. when that happens with a small community oriented trackers, the expected income of it is smaller and prolly doesn't even cover the costs of the infiltration (I'm just guessing here, buying invites/accounts on ebay and other stuff too surely).

    Just thought I'd clarify, so Louie will understant (allthough I doubt he will).
    I'm back. The downside is that I'm also old now.

  7. BitTorrent   -   #37
    Louie's Avatar Poster BT Rep: +1
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Elephant's Graveyard
    Posts
    514

    Surprised/Amazed

    Just thought I'd clarify, so Louie will understant (allthough I doubt he will).


    You're really a post machine,a rusty one more precisely.

    Also there's that. Again pure stats
    You dont know words real meaning

    when you infiltrate TL, you're looking at big profits
    Profits from what?anyway wish you good luck to you and your nice small clean communities that you praise so much,btw what happen with gft torrents number?

    Keep your signature in old sanskrit please.

  8. BitTorrent   -   #38
    The_Martinator's Avatar I is posting MACHINE BT Rep: +6BT Rep +6
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    I is everywhere!!
    Age
    36
    Posts
    2,598
    You don't know grammar. I may not use the right words all the time, but grammar is the basis of a language. (and that's the last of flaming I'm gonna do)

    Oh, profits from people being forced to pay fines. surely some of that money goes to the people tha infiltrated the tracker in the first place. More people=more fines

    The GFT torrents number, it decreased. Didn't you know that? You mean why? That has also been explained already.
    Last edited by The_Martinator; 06-18-2009 at 03:03 PM.
    I'm back. The downside is that I'm also old now.

  9. BitTorrent   -   #39
    Well how often do people have to pay? Seriously, I've only seen complaints about warnings(mainly from ISPs), never seen a case on TL where people got a demand to pay. The people that infiltrated the tracker is the anti-piracy-organisation, and they probably got money from the client in the first place.


    More people(leechers/seeders) on a tracker doesn't always mean more fines, because the caught person has to be from the right country and can't be hiding behind a VPN, if so the caught individual will be useless. And from what I've seen, it's mostly about ISPs telling their customer to stop sharing this and this file, so I wouldn't really call a tracker 'infiltrated' because of that.

  10. BitTorrent   -   #40
    Quote Originally Posted by NSMB View Post
    Well how often do people have to pay? Seriously, I've only seen complaints about warnings(mainly from ISPs), never seen a case on TL where people got a demand to pay. The people that infiltrated the tracker is the anti-piracy-organisation, and they probably got money from the client in the first place.


    More people(leechers/seeders) on a tracker doesn't always mean more fines, because the caught person has to be from the right country and can't be hiding behind a VPN, if so the caught individual will be useless. And from what I've seen, it's mostly about ISPs telling their customer to stop sharing this and this file, so I wouldn't really call a tracker 'infiltrated' because of that.
    VPN's don't make you completely invisible right? Isn't there a way they can still track your ip with sharing activity on a shared/dds box? Or is that just far fetched?
    Last edited by Gutshot; 06-18-2009 at 05:25 PM.

Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •