Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 31 to 38 of 38

Thread: 3dmark 2001

  1. #31
    Originally posted by 3RA1N1AC@14 October 2003 - 02:59


    personally i'm just wary of using a bench test to predict performance in real world programs, because a good programmer can make a lean & mean program that produces great results on low spec hardware, and a bad programmer can easily create a hog that achieves very little on even the highest spec PCs.
    This is true, and very well stated.

    So which benchmark do you think measures the "hogs" and which one do you think measures the 'lean and mean?"

  2. Software & Hardware   -   #32
    _John_Lennon_'s Avatar Poster
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Strawberry Fields
    Posts
    1,176
    Meh, I think I have just shy of 6k, although I am running dx 9 on my Ge Force MX 440 128MB card. And at defaults for the video card too.

    http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=6852086

  3. Software & Hardware   -   #33
    Originally posted by kurtsl0an@14 October 2003 - 01:26
    3779.

    Athlon XP 2600
    512MB RAM
    NVidia GeoForce MX 440 64MB

    Good thing i'm not a gamer! 
    I have same card and same amount of ram so how can my 1.3 duron beat your xp2600+ ???

  4. Software & Hardware   -   #34
    Poster
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    IL
    Posts
    1,044
    Originally posted by neattairoski+14 October 2003 - 04:18--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (neattairoski @ 14 October 2003 - 04:18)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-kurtsl0an@14 October 2003 - 01:26
    3779.

    Athlon XP 2600
    512MB RAM
    NVidia GeoForce MX 440 64MB

    Good thing i&#39;m not a gamer&#33;
    I have same card and same amount of ram so how can my 1.3 duron beat your xp2600+ ??? [/b][/quote]
    i dunno - maybe cuz i had like six progs open while i ran the test?

  5. Software & Hardware   -   #35
    Originally posted by adamp2p@13 October 2003 - 18:27
    So which benchmark do you think measures the "hogs" and which one do you think measures the &#39;lean and mean?"
    um... off the top of my head, i can&#39;t think of one that i&#39;d say is an accurate representation of overall performance. there prolly isn&#39;t one. hence the reason why most review sites put video cards through a series of tests, both synthetic benches and time-demos from retail games.

    as far as i know, there is no simple one-size-fits-all test that&#39;ll show you how well a system will run all games.

  6. Software & Hardware   -   #36
    Wolfmight's Avatar Poster BT Rep: +1
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Location: Location:
    Posts
    5,545
    cant remember my score, but i got like 15,000 somethin last time i ran the benchmark on 2001. Wont let me install it cause i got DirectX 9.. that&#39;s a bunch of crap.

  7. Software & Hardware   -   #37
    _John_Lennon_'s Avatar Poster
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Strawberry Fields
    Posts
    1,176
    Originally posted by neattairoski+13 October 2003 - 23:18--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (neattairoski @ 13 October 2003 - 23:18)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-kurtsl0an@14 October 2003 - 01:26
    3779.

    Athlon XP 2600
    512MB RAM
    NVidia GeoForce MX 440 64MB

    Good thing i&#39;m not a gamer&#33;
    I have same card and same amount of ram so how can my 1.3 duron beat your xp2600+ ??? [/b][/quote]
    Maybe you have faster ram than him.....

  8. Software & Hardware   -   #38
    Mr. Peabody's Avatar Poster
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Somewhere in time.
    Posts
    77
    11,840
    XP 2400
    512MB ram
    Geforce 4 ti 4400
    Suffering from a wet dream, no it's just me I had to pee.

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •