Nvidia. Just think about the drivers.
Nvidia. Just think about the drivers.
ATI for their better choice - i'd choose 9600pro over 5600, because the its faster and not too much more expensive (its cheaper in some cases)
also because of the HL2 and Aquamark benchmarks i've seen
The Sexay Half Of ABBA And Max: Freelance Plants
where can i find detailed info to compare a gfx 5200 and 5200 ultra? i can oc mine to a ultra, but i'm not sure wat the specs r
still nVidia is leading
"You can be mad as a mad dog at the way things went; you can swear and curse the fates, but when it comes to the end, you have to let go"Benjamen button
Originally posted by bawa@Klite_user@13 October 2003 - 15:15
still nVidia is leadingToms Hardware. You guys should read the whole article next time.We'll only be able to draw a definite conclusion about the GeForceFX 5600 when ATi launches the new Radeon 9600 series. But compared to the Radeon 9500 PRO (priced about the same, at $199), NVIDIA's mainstream flagship comes up short. In addition, there's the FSAA/ anisotropic image quality of the ATi R3x0 chip, which turned out to be significantly better in our previous test. The only thing that can save NVIDIA from more serious damage is the poor delivery situation that is typical with ATi.
I'd choose Nvidia, since its usally the gamers choice.
ATI is more of a buisness type video card.
Nvidia has horrible drivers though.
9800 pro is better than 5900 ultra. but sometimes its hard to tell the difference.
how they compare up
Nvidia=AMD great quality, lower price
Radeon=Intel better, cost alot more
Bookmarks