Cpu Comparison

[bigdawgfoxx]

Always is Kunal lol..they dont like each other very much. Thanx for the information guys

[Keikan]

Today's versus

Intel Pentium II 400mhz VS Intel Celeron 566mhz

Pentium II: 100mhz FSB, 512kb of L2 cache?
Celeron: 66mhz FSB, 128kb of L2 cache

Who would win?



(I dunno about teh caches but i got them from computergeeks.com)

[lynx]

Originally posted by Keikan@2 November 2003 - 21:20
Who would win?

Who cares?

[DarthInsinuate]

i would say the Pentium, because that seems like a pretty big difference in L2

[Keikan]

Originally posted by lynx+2 November 2003 - 15:15--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (lynx @ 2 November 2003 - 15:15)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Keikan@2 November 2003 - 21:20
Who would win?

Who cares? [/b][/quote]
good point

[_John_Lennon_]

A Few Things.

one thing, that 2.2 is 110 you said, and the 2500+ is about 89 dollars, if u use pricegrabber.

the 2.2 is on the old willimette core I believe, not the NorthWood one (might be wrong, but I think its with the 1.8 and 1.6 P4&#39;s on the old core.)

@ Abu&#39;s post. Abu was partly right. Although the 2500 will beat that 2.2 hands down in just about every single test, the RAM and Motherboard you use will greatly determine how they benchmark against each other.

Tryin testing that 2500 on PC 133 Ram, against that P4 on its 3500 Ram, and see what benchmarks you get....

[Virtualbody1234]

Tryin testing that 2500 on PC 133 Ram, against that P4 on its 3500 Ram, and see what benchmarks you get....

You can&#39;t. The 2500+ is the barton core which the FSB runs at 333mhz. There aren&#39;t any motherboards that use PC 133 with a FSB of 333.

[_John_Lennon_]

Originally posted by Virtualbody1234@2 November 2003 - 22:43

Tryin testing that 2500 on PC 133 Ram, against that P4 on its 3500 Ram, and see what benchmarks you get....

You can&#39;t. The 2500+ is the barton core which the FSB runs at 333mhz. There aren&#39;t any motherboards that use PC 133 with a FSB of 333.

Exactly my point, the kind of Ram you have DOES matter.


Also, the Barton&#39;s are 400Mhz, not 333, the palaminos are 333Mhz.

[Virtualbody1234]

You obviously did not read my post. You cannot run PC 133 RAM with a barton.

And I will correct you here. The Barton is 333 MHz FSB.

Only the fastest 3000+ and 3200+ are available at 400 FSB.

Proof ---&#62; http://www.computerhq.com/hardware/p...-id-32019.html

and ---&#62; http://www.rojakpot.com/default.aspx?locat...&var1=26&var2=0

[_John_Lennon_]

Originally posted by Virtualbody1234@2 November 2003 - 23:14
You obviously did not read my post. You cannot run PC 133 RAM with a barton.

And I will correct you here. The Barton is 333 MHz FSB.

Only the fastest 3000+ and 3200+ are available at 400 FSB.

Only the Fastest 3000+ and 3200+ are available at 400FSB? lol, what do you think alot of the bartons are? I know the stepping for my 2500, is widely regarded as an underclocked 400Mhz barton line. Shall I show you my cpu Stats where im running the resulting Bus speed at 400Mhz?

Im well aware that with the exception of the newer 3000, and 3200 Barton are set to the 166.5 Mhz Front Side Bus, x2 being where they get the 333Mhz Bus Speed, but that doesnt mean that my Barton cant run at that.