Originally posted by blackhatknight@4 November 2003 - 01:16
before you moderate think

the only thing that concerns me about this topic is the use of the word bastard, i am aware of the rules that moderate this forum i would say it is a crying shame should the language overshadow it, i genuiely believe bastard is however an oppropriate term this guy is removed, removed from humanity, removed from the principles that concieved him, removed from whatever morals (in any would have perviously governed his life) in every since a bastard
The rules do not prevent swearing, they prevent excessive swearing.

They also say you have to respect other members... ie Dont call each other stuff like this.

I dont feel that either guideline has been broken here.

He cant be tried for murder or manslaughter, as there is no death....yet.


Unless one of them dies within a year of the act (already passed), then he cant be tried for murder at all.

As soon as there is a death however, he can then be tried for manslaughter....over and above the "Biological GBH" that he has already been convicted of.

There is no "Double Jeopardy" involved (not that ths matters these days in the UK ) as it is a seperate crime... ie Death, rather than injury.