Last one to post wins the internets (archived)

[SomePeople]

You are too modest, Dave. Your first hundred+ posts here involved "that woman". Who was "that woman" if not Squeams? Passive-aggressive counts as "slipping", Dave Dowell.

You missed commenting:
1) about how each and everyone of those posts didn't identify (in fact going out of my way to make sure they couldn't identify her as ) 'that woman' was her
2) about how each and everyone was about what she had done to me
3) about how many of them pointed out that she was a perfectly nice individual if you could accept her lying,
4) about the many posts where I defended 'that woman' from nasty shite you lot all spewed forth about 'that woman' (you know like when Mary called her a whore).

You also missed that each and everyone of those posts was in direct response to one of you posting something about 'that woman', and that not one of my posts about 'that woman' was addressed to her, or aimed at her.

It's OK though, I understand you don't like inconvenient facts to get in the way of your little hatreds. Kind of upsets the flow of the nasty personalised comments, and rants, I suspect?

[mjmacky]

I made you a site Dave, go continue posting over there.

[megabyteme]

You are too modest, Dave. Your first hundred+ posts here involved "that woman". Who was "that woman" if not Squeams? Passive-aggressive counts as "slipping", Dave Dowell.

You missed commenting:
1) about how each and everyone of those posts didn't identify (in fact going out of my way to make sure they couldn't identify her as ) 'that woman' was her
2) about how each and everyone was about what she had done to me
3) about how many of them pointed out that she was a perfectly nice individual if you could accept her lying,
4) about the many posts where I defended 'that woman' from nasty shite you lot all spewed forth about 'that woman' (you know like when Mary called her a whore).

You also missed that each and everyone of those posts was in direct response to one of you posting something about 'that woman', and that not one of my posts about 'that woman' was addressed to her, or aimed at her.

It's OK though, I understand you don't like inconvenient facts to get in the way of your little hatreds. Kind of upsets the flow of the nasty personalised comments, and rants, I suspect?

Dave, if you showed up at a bar where Squeams was a regular, and started spewing (yes, spewing) shit about how "that woman" did blah, blah, blah... all that would be needed to get you thrown out would be for her (or any other woman) to point out that you were her ex- and that you were spouting off about her. If your intent was so "pure" here, "that woman" would have never been mentioned. Are you implying members of this bored are psychic and "coaxed" it out of you?

The fact is, you should have been shown the door MUCH sooner. That was the only error made by the mods here.

You are a creep, and a poor fucking liar. Again, not one person has bought your BULLSHIT story ever.

EDIT- Now you are admitting Mary was not "in the loop". Does this mean his "hate site" wasn't started because of Squeams "lies"?

[SomePeople]

Dave, if you showed up at a bar where Squeams was a regular, and started spewing (yes, spewing) shit about how "that woman" did blah, blah, blah... all that would be needed to get you thrown out would be for her (or any other woman) to point out that you were her ex- and that you were spouting off about her. If your intent was so "pure" here, "that woman" would have never been mentioned. Are you implying members of this bored are psychic and "coaxed" it out of you?

The fact is, you should have been shown the door MUCH sooner. That was the only error made by the mods here.

You are a creep, and a poor fucking liar. Again, not one person has bought your BULLSHIT story ever.

EDIT- Now you are admitting Mary was not "in the loop". Does this mean his "hate site" wasn't started because of Squeams "lies"?

I have no idea where this little fantasy is going.

It's really simple I was asked what had made me willing to be a cunt. I answered that question.

From that point on you all decided to make post after post about that woman, and I answered your posts as you made them.

If you didn't want me to answer your posts, you shouldn't have posted them. I told you all that more than once.

[mjmacky]

Dave, if you showed up at a bar where Squeams was a regular, and started spewing (yes, spewing) shit about how "that woman" did blah, blah, blah... all that would be needed to get you thrown out would be for her (or any other woman) to point out that you were her ex- and that you were spouting off about her. If your intent was so "pure" here, "that woman" would have never been mentioned. Are you implying members of this bored are psychic and "coaxed" it out of you?

The fact is, you should have been shown the door MUCH sooner. That was the only error made by the mods here.

You are a creep, and a poor fucking liar. Again, not one person has bought your BULLSHIT story ever.

EDIT- Now you are admitting Mary was not "in the loop". Does this mean his "hate site" wasn't started because of Squeams "lies"?

I'm going to be pleasant and request that you stop trying to reason with Dave. It makes me feel bad to watch you waste the effort. If I knew you could travel to alternate realities, I'd have some hope, but he's too far warped to resolve our reality-based environment.

[SomePeople]

I'm going to be pleasant and request that you stop trying to reason with Dave. It makes me feel bad to watch you waste the effort. If I knew you could travel to alternate realities, I'd have some hope, but he's too far warped to resolve our reality-based environment.

How the fuck do you feel qualified to comment upon reality? You who set up a hate site based upon a complete pack of malicious lies. You who compares someone who isn't like your father to your father and finds a match, whilst ignoring your own hate based behavioural matches to him?

[mjmacky]

How the fuck do you feel qualified to comment upon reality? You who set up a hate site based upon a complete pack of malicious lies. You who compares someone who isn't like your father to your father and finds a match, whilst ignoring your own hate based behavioural matches to him?

Shut up dad, I didn't want to live with you anyway.

[SomePeople]

Shut up dad, I didn't want to live with you anyway.

I wouldn't have a son who treated other people like you do, I'd disown you.

Is that what happened Mary? Did it go down like that? Give me his email address, so we can find out... come on, you know you want to.

[mjmacky]

Shut up dad, I didn't want to live with you anyway.

I wouldn't have a son who treated other people like you do, I'd disown you.

Is that what happened Mary? Did it go down like that? Give me his email address, so we can find out... come on, you know you want to.

Sure, if you want to be told the same story twice, here's the email

Spoiler: Show

[email protected]

[SomePeople]

Sure, if you want to be told the same story twice, here's the email

Spoiler: Show

[email protected]

And there I was thinking you might be more than just another cowardly piece of internet shite. Someone who had the balls to stand behind what he said. Seems I was wrong, although why you feel the need to keep proving it to me over and over again is baffling me.