Getting in contact with other members

[megabyteme]

'I'm going to kill one of you'

I volunteer

You'd snap his arm like a twig.

[ckrit]

Actually it was "thorn" which was a chavis dupe.

He did it long before you were a mod, and therefore before you had access to read manicgeeks report in the reporting section.

And when he did it neither of you knew manicgeek was an old account of mine.

I'm guessing he got it from that original PM she sent him about me being here to threaten her, the one she sent claiming I was threatening her with uploading content she knew I didn't have (and you call me paranoid), if not that PM it would have been one of the subsequent PMs they exchanged.

Thorn was me.

I was in discourse with the mod team about you. They asked me if you were TheDave messing about. I was like 'wut, no. this reject guy is old and is a mentalist' but obviously realised that your name was Dave. This was then confirmed.

I searched the report section for different accounts of yours when I became a mod and saw that post. I didn't tell anyone about your other accounts, someone else figured that out for himself.

But why were you deleting a bajillion of dave's special snowflake posts before he got banned. That's what I'd like to know.

[Barbarossa]

Dave, will you please list these "private details" that were given out?

Stuff I have gathered about you...

1. Your name is Dave.
2. You live in England on the opposite side of the country from Squeams (I don't know which side Squeams lives on, or care).
3. You cheated on your wife for 5 years with Squeams.
4. You have more than 2 kids.
5. One is a boy, age 5 (which you recently revealed in your own blog).
6. You had to pay taxes on a car you get from work (some English "values of use" tax).
7. You drove across the country to lean on Squeam's balustrade (it was through this that I learned what a "balustrade" is).
8. At some point after the affair ended, you showed up at her work, and got escorted out by security.
9. You have had other "conflicts" with members of other sites who also formed an "alliance" of dislike for you.
10. You were once a member of mumsnet under the same name as you used on this site. You seem to feel "stalked" when a member here used google to search for that name.
11. You have clear anger issues.
12. You don't seem to realize what a break-up is.
13. You are generally disliked, and enjoy blogging about people who dislike you.

Have I missed anything? None of this means fuck all, honestly.

FINALLY! Now I'm up to speed!

[manker]

Surely this must confuse Dave. Will he see the manifestation of his paranoia, or will he dig deeper into his delusion?

I'm going to have to insist that in future you append such blatant rhetoric with a percontation point.

[mjmacky]

But why were you deleting a bajillion of dave's special snowflake posts before he got banned. That's what I'd like to know.

Why not direct that question to Dave?

[manker]

Thorn was me.

I was in discourse with the mod team about you. They asked me if you were TheDave messing about. I was like 'wut, no. this reject guy is old and is a mentalist' but obviously realised that your name was Dave. This was then confirmed.

I searched the report section for different accounts of yours when I became a mod and saw that post. I didn't tell anyone about your other accounts, someone else figured that out for himself.

But why were you deleting a bajillion of dave's special snowflake posts before he got banned. That's what I'd like to know.

There's a perfectly reasonable explanation for this.


I was trying to hide the facts

[mentalman]

I love poking you lot with a pointy stick, I sharpened it all weekend for this one

manker you need me around here mate, look at how many posts I've generated this morning. The rest of the week your little board is going to be the normal old boring shite.

Oh! Have you figured out if todays blogged bewbs are Squeamies yet?

[ckrit]

But why were you deleting a bajillion of dave's special snowflake posts before he got banned. That's what I'd like to know.

Why not direct that question to Dave?

'cos dave says it was manker. duh.

[manker]

But why were you deleting a bajillion of dave's special snowflake posts before he got banned. That's what I'd like to know.

Why not direct that question to Dave?

I answered in his stead above.
It would be unthinkable that he would answer aught else.

[mjmacky]

Surely this must confuse Dave. Will he see the manifestation of his paranoia, or will he dig deeper into his delusion?

I'm going to have to insist that in future you append such blatant rhetoric with a percontation point.

I don't know the Alt code