taken 1,2,3 in blu ray no point see that movie in dvd
taken 1,2,3 in blu ray no point see that movie in dvd
Persona non grata
I'm fluctuating between you merely lacking taste and you being borderline retarded.So I'm gong to do the fair thing and split and difference and just say that you're a borderline retard with no taste.
Taken 1 was sort of OK for a couple of lines and that it gave Liam Neeson the opportunity to be an action star but Taken 2 was so bad that I have no desire to ever see Taken 3.
Also a good movie is a good movie regardless of format so I guess that explains your need t see Taken in blu ray.
Respect my lack of authority.
'John Wick' starring Keanu Reeves was surprisingly entertaining.
'Taken 3' was ok. It's the same thing as before but keep me out of mischief for an hour and a half.
Last edited by NP1975; 01-29-2015 at 04:33 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Persona non grata
You have extremely low standards and by "low" I mean none at all.
John Wicks on the other hand was pretty decent but the ovbious low budget and the stupid blood splatter special effect head shots every time he shot anybody was extremely distracting.
Watch Man on Fire and then try to make anyone believe that.Originally Posted by Arlathan
Last edited by IdolEyes787; 01-29-2015 at 10:08 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Respect my lack of authority.
Retired
Olivier Megaton could not frame or edit an action sequence to save his life. You'd think having been around Besson and Morel, some talent would have rubbed off on the guy. Taken 3's scenes are literally headache and nausea inducing. Guy needs to lay off the adderall before hitting the edit bay.
Poster
Olivier Megaton could not frame or edit an action sequence to save his life. You'd think having been around Besson and Morel, some talent would have rubbed off on the guy. Taken 3's scenes are literally headache and nausea inducing. Guy needs to lay off the adderall before hitting the edit bay.
Totally agree!
(What is your take cinematography and screenplay wise on "Nightcrawler"...thumbs up, thumbs down or just delete?)
“Life has become immeasurably better since I have been forced to stop taking it seriously.” ― Hunter S. Thompson
Retired
Great movie. Gyllenhaal is riveting. Real shame he wasn't nominated. All the nighttime shots look good, reminded me of Michael Mann's night cityscape stuff.
Totally agree!
(What is your take cinematography and screenplay wise on "Nightcrawler"...thumbs up, thumbs down or just delete?)
RASPBERRY RIPPLE
BT Rep: +19
I hesitated on recommending Nightcrawler because I didn't expect others would enjoy it as much as I did. One of those, "Why did you tell me that was good?!?!" kind of shows. I'm glad I'm not the only one who found it interesting.Great movie. Gyllenhaal is riveting. Real shame he wasn't nominated. All the nighttime shots look good, reminded me of Michael Mann's night cityscape stuff.
Totally agree!
(What is your take cinematography and screenplay wise on "Nightcrawler"...thumbs up, thumbs down or just delete?)
Gyllenhall's performance was quite good, IMO.
Far better than the overly-touted Birdman that I just finished. Well-acted,pretentiouswell-edited; shit story.
Retired
Not being versed in matters theatrical or that thespian soliloquy shit, I think a lot of the movie was lost on me. My takeaway was Ed Norton needs to act in more movies and Emma Stone should eat a sandwich (or 3).
BTW, any reviews that note the film's meta-commentary like it's some kind of profundity are just as annoying as those American Sniper meatheads.
Last edited by piercerseth; 01-30-2015 at 12:08 PM.
Persona non grata
Reprehensible bottom feeding protagonist in a decidedly downbeat movie.Like where do I sign up?
Respect my lack of authority.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks