The first one was the original story, the other two were added because of the popularity of the first, thinking they could make more money.Originally posted by junkyardking+29 November 2003 - 04:19--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (junkyardking @ 29 November 2003 - 04:19)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-k-liteuserintheworld@29 November 2003 - 03:20
he is dead, he aint coming back to life, they arn't going to make a 4th one, remember all three movies were just one story, I think they know that making a new one would ruin it.
Didnt stop them from making the last two which complety ruined the story from the first, making a fourth wouldnt bother them in the slightest, holloywoods about making money not telling a story, just take a look at all the other sequals like T3.
When holloywood gets it's hands on great oringinal storys they always ruin it with sequals, i wouldnt be surprised if they tried to make a lord of the rings 4 or some offshoot of it. [/b][/quote]
sorry but your wrong if you followed the matrix from the start you would have known the story was to be split into 3 movies
Bookmarks