My Soon To Be Revised Pc!

[clocker]

Well, Denver isn't all that far away.

Maybe if you strained a bit?

[abu_has_the_power]

Originally posted by adamp2p+1 December 2003 - 18:43--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (adamp2p &#064; 1 December 2003 - 18:43)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-abu_has_the_power@2 December 2003 - 00:07
hey adamp2p, wat&#39;s ur aquamark score again? i just got a radeon 9600. my score is 20808. is that good or bad?

That&#39;s good enough, abu. We are in no competition. I hope your new card plays your games and keeps you happy. Does the 9600 overclock to the speed of the 9600 pro? What kind of memory chips are on it and what does the small writing say. If you enter it I can tell you what cas latency you have.

It even says in the aquamark3 end screen that 20,000 and above will play the next generation games well. I would think you could score 30,000 with that card overclocked. [/b][/quote]
i just tried this. i have a prob. every time i set a new clock and ram speed, i click apply and yes. then i click ok. i go back into the thing, and it&#39;s back at my original default setting. wtf? and sometimes, i click on apply, and it automatically reverts back to default. a little help?

EDIT: nevermind, i got RadLinker & RadClocker - Windows 2000/XP from guru3d.com. it&#39;s like wat coolbits does with the nvidia driver, it adds a tab for ocing. and it works great. but thanks anyway man

[adamp2p]

Originally posted by abu_has_the_power+2 December 2003 - 03:53--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (abu_has_the_power @ 2 December 2003 - 03:53)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>

Originally posted by adamp2p@1 December 2003 - 18:43
<!--QuoteBegin-abu_has_the_power

@2 December 2003 - 00:07
hey adamp2p, wat&#39;s ur aquamark score again? i just got a radeon 9600. my score is 20808. is that good or bad?

That&#39;s good enough, abu. We are in no competition. I hope your new card plays your games and keeps you happy. Does the 9600 overclock to the speed of the 9600 pro? What kind of memory chips are on it and what does the small writing say. If you enter it I can tell you what cas latency you have.

It even says in the aquamark3 end screen that 20,000 and above will play the next generation games well. I would think you could score 30,000 with that card overclocked.

i just tried this. i have a prob. every time i set a new clock and ram speed, i click apply and yes. then i click ok. i go back into the thing, and it&#39;s back at my original default setting. wtf? and sometimes, i click on apply, and it automatically reverts back to default. a little help?

EDIT: nevermind, i got RadLinker & RadClocker - Windows 2000/XP from guru3d.com. it&#39;s like wat coolbits does with the nvidia driver, it adds a tab for ocing. and it works great. but thanks anyway man [/b][/quote]
Be careful with Radclocker...its easy to over do it...

Just be sure to keep the core: 400 and the mem: 600 (300 X2 ddr)

RADEON 9600 PRO

[atiVidia]

Originally posted by adamp2p+2 December 2003 - 01:54--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (adamp2p @ 2 December 2003 - 01:54)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>

Originally posted by atiVidia@2 December 2003 - 01:15
<!--QuoteBegin-HardcoreGamer

@2 December 2003 - 00:11
So what graphics card should I use?

your pick:

both ati and nvidia are good

5700 ultra or 9600xt is what it comes down to

only difference between the two is slight performance loss on ATI&#39;s part, and high noise (not too bad) on nVidia&#39;s part

if you dont like noise, go to ATI

if you add noise for performance, go to nVidia

if you have money to burn, get an nvidia 5950 ultra, as it is quiet and better than the 9800 XT (be warned, both the 9800 xt and the 5950 ultra are 500 dollars&#33;&#33;&#33

I want you to show me ONE review that concludes that Nvidia is the leader in any benchmark that uses high AA and AF.

You can&#39;t. Sure, Nvidia can make a fast card...but as soon as you want to see a high quality picture at high resolution with AA and AF, Nvidia is owned, slapped, brusied, crying rape.... [/b][/quote]
i never sed that nvidia gets high framerates with high AA and ASF, but at least they could have validated the benchmarks...

if i were you, i would get a matrox parhelia, as it is the absolute best in hogh AA and ASF

[GCNaddict]

god damn man stop being so biased against ATI&#33;&#33;&#33;