Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 18 of 18

Thread: Gigapixel Pic's

  1. #11
    scribblec's Avatar Poster
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    england
    Posts
    3,221
    that road looks creepy one of them jeepers creepers style get killed roads

    do people like do 200 miles down that road?

  2. Lounge   -   #12
    backlash's Avatar usenet lover
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    in your dreams
    Posts
    1,579
    looks like sedona (the road pic)

  3. Lounge   -   #13
    cool pics didnt even even notice alag in loading time just about 1 sec and it popped up i love dsl

  4. Lounge   -   #14
    Poster
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Greenock, Scotland
    Posts
    2,646
    0.23 seconds for me...

  5. Lounge   -   #15
    4play's Avatar knob jockey
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    London
    Age
    41
    Posts
    3,824
    lol you have gigapixel images but they are compressed with jpeg which removes pixels.

    so i dont think they are any more.

  6. Lounge   -   #16
    isn't the biggest image in the world something like 100GB?
    <span style='font-size:14pt;line-height:100%'>BLAH</span>

    <span style='font-size:14pt;line-height:100%'>Wayne Rooney - A thug and a thief</span>

  7. Lounge   -   #17
    SciManAl's Avatar Hardware guy
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Wichita Kansas
    Posts
    898
    hell i know i could render a 100 gb picture, (maya helps) but i would say it depends on what you use to make the picture...

    If a camera made that pic that was 100gb then i would be amazed...

    If a computer made it... then i would not be surprizzed...

    If a camera Can take a picture and then have the time to record all the data then i would be amazed.. if it was a harddrive it would take forver to take a pic...

  8. Lounge   -   #18
    Originally posted by SciManAl@7 December 2003 - 18:16
    hell i know i could render a 100 gb picture, (maya helps) but i would say it depends on what you use to make the picture...

    If a camera made that pic that was 100gb then i would be amazed...

    If a computer made it... then i would not be surprizzed...

    If a camera Can take a picture and then have the time to record all the data then i would be amazed.. if it was a harddrive it would take forver to take a pic...
    i believe it was the hubble telescope...my figure is probably a long way off, i&#39;ll try and find it again
    <span style='font-size:14pt;line-height:100%'>BLAH</span>

    <span style='font-size:14pt;line-height:100%'>Wayne Rooney - A thug and a thief</span>

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •