Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 16

Thread: Gf Fx5600xt?

  1. #1
    i was wondering if a 5600XT would be enough for most/all games out there today. or should i go w/ a regular 5600. i want to play games like unreal, ut2k3, planetside, bf1942, american army, you get the idea. so would it be good enough?

    i can get it for about $78, or a reg 5600 for about $100 at newegg....or should i go w/ the 9600 non-pro.

  2. Software & Hardware   -   #2
    depends on the rest of the system spec and exactly how well you'd like to be able to run the games (e.g. what resolution, details etc)
    <span style='font-size:14pt;line-height:100%'>BLAH</span>

    <span style='font-size:14pt;line-height:100%'>Wayne Rooney - A thug and a thief</span>

  3. Software & Hardware   -   #3
    rest of system

    1.8ghz p4
    384mb 266mhz (pc2100) ram
    40gb WD

    and i like to run/most games on med-high setting on my max res.....1024x768(lcd monitor so...)

    is that card enough? for 78 dollars i cant help but feeling tempted to buy it now

  4. Software & Hardware   -   #4
    Originally posted by raiserblade2003@15 December 2003 - 05:10
    rest of system

    1.8ghz p4
    384mb 266mhz (pc2100) ram
    40gb WD

    and i like to run/most games on med-high setting on my max res.....1024x768(lcd monitor so...)

    is that card enough? for 78 dollars i cant help but feeling tempted to buy it now
    you should be able to play most current games well with the 5600, but you should look into getting the 9600 as an alternative
    <span style='font-size:14pt;line-height:100%'>BLAH</span>

    <span style='font-size:14pt;line-height:100%'>Wayne Rooney - A thug and a thief</span>

  5. Software & Hardware   -   #5
    how about the 5600xt


    oh and performance wise, i only need playable fps, 25+......im not a fps freak

  6. Software & Hardware   -   #6
    *bump*

  7. Software & Hardware   -   #7
    atiVidia's Avatar ^would've been cool.
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    1,522
    Originally posted by raiserblade2003@15 December 2003 - 01:16
    how about the 5600xt


    oh and performance wise, i only need playable fps, 25+......im not a fps freak
    no such thing as a 5600xt

    unless ur referring to the 5600ultra or the 5700 ultra

    i would choose the 5700 ultra (if u have a microcenter in ur area, u mite be able to find a 9800pro for 300 bucks&#33;&#33;&#33; oh yea, ur not an fps phreak)

  8. Software & Hardware   -   #8
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Guatemala
    Posts
    4,044
    ut2k3? well if ur not an "fps freak" (btw...adding that phrase to my websters dic )..... ut2k3 runs on my mx440.... but i think the 5600ultra would be enuff for it

  9. Software & Hardware   -   #9
    Originally posted by atiVidia+15 December 2003 - 13:35--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (atiVidia &#064; 15 December 2003 - 13:35)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-raiserblade2003@15 December 2003 - 01:16
    how about the 5600xt


    oh and performance wise, i only need playable fps, 25+......im not a fps freak
    no such thing as a 5600xt

    unless ur referring to the 5600ultra or the 5700 ultra

    i would choose the 5700 ultra (if u have a microcenter in ur area, u mite be able to find a 9800pro for 300 bucks&#33;&#33;&#33; oh yea, ur not an fps phreak) [/b][/quote]
    heres an 5600xt

    5600xt is just a slower clockec 5600

  10. Software & Hardware   -   #10
    so is it worth it?

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •