Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Wal-mart In Online Music Store Initiative

  1. #1

    Wal-Mart, the world's largest retailer, has jumped into the online music market by launching a download service with prices that undercut rivals such as Apple's iTunes music store and Roxio's revamped Napster site.


    US consumers can now purchase songs on Wal-Mart's music site for 88 cents a track, compared with the 99 cent standard established this year by Apple. Wal-Mart appears to be betting it can use its vast scale to push prices down to levels at which rivals cannot compete.

    The world's largest retailer stressed that it was offering downloadable tracks on a trial basis so that it could gather customer feedback and make necessary changes before officially launching the service early next year.

    The retailer is the latest company to push into digital music sales and some analysts are already suggesting many online music retailers will not survive the inevitable consolidation.

    Wal-Mart's service is compatible only with computers running Microsoft Windows and music players that operate on the Windows Media Audio format. That excludes consumers with Apple computers and iPod music players.

    The technical details are likely to insulate to some degree Apple's music store from Wal-Mart's competitive pricing, but the retailer could nonetheless force rivals to drop prices.

    Steve Jobs, Apple chief executive, said in a recent interview that his company's music store was not very profitable, but boosted its earnings by driving sales of its popular iPod music player.

    Apple has sold more than 25m songs since launching its music store this year.

    Wal-Mart would not say whether its new music site would be profitable selling single songs at 88 cents and albums at $9.44. The company also declined to discuss whether Wal-Mart had secured more favourable terms from top record labels.

    Phil Leigh, analyst at Inside Digital Media, said 88 cent downloads would clearly attract customers to Wal-Mart's music store, but consumers would not return to the site if it did not offer an easy-to-use interactive "buying experience".

    "Apple is insulated a bit, but I think that the others could be impacted to varying degrees. A lot will depend on the experience the consumer gets on these sites," said Mr Leigh.

    Wal-Mart's online music store is run by Liquid Digital Media, a division of Anderson Merchandisers, a private company that already supplies compact discs to the retailer. Anderson acquired Liquid Digital Media in January in the hope of moving into online music distribution.
    http://news.ft.com/servlet/ContentServer?p...d=1071251652371

  2. Music   -   #2
    Jayhawk's Avatar Rock Chalk Jayhawk BT Rep: +5
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Nebraska
    Age
    40
    Posts
    1,966
    yeah but who wants to pay 88 cents when you can get it for free

  3. Music   -   #3
    old school
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Age
    42
    Posts
    1,968
    Originally posted by KwahyaJ@19 December 2003 - 00:32
    yeah but who wants to pay 88 cents when you can get it for free
    very well said

    nice try white trash mart

  4. Music   -   #4
    Poster
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    86
    If they push the price down far enough, people won't mind paying.

    They're just trying to make it possible for people to do the downloading thing without giving them a reason to download kazaa or the like. It'll work too, because of all the fake files and hassles of free music.

    Once it's user friendly, paying a small amount won't worry people.

    I'll still download all my music though.
    Stoopid News - My Blog / Stoopid News site. All wierd, wacky, crazy news.

  5. Music   -   #5
    man screw walmart, you know why they can make things cheaper. They treat theri employees like trash. They dont allow unions give them terrible hours, no benefits. Their fuckin capitlist pigs. and people still shop their because its like 2 cents cheaper. Shows how far humanity has come. I also agree, i dont see how any pay per track company can make it, i have roguhly 900 songs and 200 vids i wouldnt enver pay money for any of it.


    Socialist comments provided by-
    Lord Tallen

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •