Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 18 of 18

Thread: Music Program

  1. #11
    winamp rulez

  2. Music   -   #12
    - Nightmare -'s Avatar Arch-angel
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Nassau, Bahamas
    Age
    38
    Posts
    627
    Originally posted by Illustrious@1 January 2004 - 22:16
    winamp rulez


    Ditto.


    It is time...

    ...for the end to be stopped.

  3. Music   -   #13
    Jibbler's Avatar proud member of MDS
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    USA
    Age
    47
    Posts
    2,124
    Originally posted by Arm@1 January 2004 - 06:58
    I use CDex for ripping and encoding. I'm not some snobby audiophile so I don't give a fuck if the sound is perfect. Hell, I don't even encode my mp3s at anything higher then 128k.
    CDex isn't a bad progie for ripping, since it allows EAC/Lame, but 128? Are you kidding? Comparing 128 to 192 is like comparing dialup to broadband. They will both get you there, but why not take the best route? :music1:
    Proud member of MDS

  4. Music   -   #14
    Arm's Avatar Poster
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    a well
    Age
    36
    Posts
    1,437
    Really I never noticed any difference. Maybe when you have the Enhancer and 4Front headphones plugins on Winamp it makes the sound better you notice no difference.

  5. Music   -   #15
    I have never rippsed a CD yet, but I will do when I get time.

    I used to use Winamp 2.8X

    But I have just started using Foobar and its sound quality seems much clearer to me and I like the way I can have several playlists loaded up and swap between them, and see which playlist I am playing right now and then when I call it up next day the playlists are all there ready to go.

    Thsi is what I asked the guys at winamp to do, but they never did.

    You never know the name of the playlist you are playing in winamp cos it does not show anywhere.

    Just wish Foobar would look a bit better.

    Digby
    NZ

    PS stick to the subject and stop rubbishing each other.

    Lets discuss the merits of 128 v 196 in another thread in a gentlemanly fashion.

  6. Music   -   #16
    Afronaut's Avatar Xenu
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Teegeeack
    Posts
    3,688
    Originally posted by digmen1@3 January 2004 - 02:19

    PS stick to the subject and stop rubbishing each other.
    Agreed.


    I use EAC for ripping, just like in the Pinned Topic.
    But, sometimes it fails, i have some very "well used" cd's and EAC just wont get the data out of it. But when it works the files are good,
    if i want perfect, i rip them to *.wav
    Then i use Audiograbber (the Tagging is cool from the net) with Lame.
    Or, i use Steinberg Wavelab 4.0g. with Lame.

    Most of the Tagging is done with Tag & Rename and
    organising is done with OrangeCD.

    Cheers:
    -GS-
    Spoiler: Show

  7. Music   -   #17
    [SIZE=1]I only started ripping CDs about a year ago and used to use Musicmatch, which I soon realised was a bag of shite for a number of reasons. I now use Audiograbber (with LAME) and winamp, but I have noticed that a lot of people prefer EAC. What are the main differences, and are there any major differences in quality?

    Thanks

  8. Music   -   #18
    FuNkY CaPrIcOrN's Avatar Poster
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Louisville Kentucky
    Age
    49
    Posts
    7,341
    DBPowerAMP to Rip.

    NERO 6 to Burn.

    And WinAMP 5 to Play.

    Ohhhhhh.Lets not forget.OrangeCD to Catalog.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •