You Do Not Have The Required Amount Of Posts

[Adster]

Originally posted by jetje@8 January 2004 - 00:21
well... we have:

1) flood control
2) after he posted once...his adress B)

yep I guess it's better then nothing

also I guess when they register they wouldn't have a clue how many post they need for Pming

and yeah the address good point you will have the address straight away imagine a well known member spamming Pms with another name, as you said at least you will get the address never thought of that

[jetje]

Originally posted by Adster@7 January 2004 - 15:26
and yeah the address good point you will have the address straight away imagine a well known member spamming Pms with another name, as you said at least you will get the address never thought of that

That's why we have the smartest members made admin and mods :angel2: :-" :-"

[internet.news]

Originally posted by nanotek+7 January 2004 - 14:38--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (nanotek @ 7 January 2004 - 14:38)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-srosner@7 January 2004 - 13:32
So how many posts do I have to have?&nbsp; I don&#39;t like to post whore, but I will do what I must.

i think u need 20 posts to view your pms [/b][/quote]
Probably some admin can set it down to 2 posts. I think the PM System is essential, isn&#39;t it? As this is a board to share files & thoughts?

[srosner]

It makes perfect sense, now that I am over 6 posts I just thought something was busted.

[Sparkle1984]

I agree with internet.news, but I think the minimum should be set down to one post, because the PM system is an important part of a forum, if people want to communicate without everyone seeing what they&#39;re saying.

[Marius24]

i dont use PMs that much. I have been here a while (or atleast i think i have) but yet have only used the PM system 5 or 6 times and only for stuff that cant be talked about on the board

[jetje]

Originally posted by Sparkle1984@7 January 2004 - 17:19
I agree with internet.news, but I think the minimum should be set down to one post, because the PM system is an important part of a forum, if people want to communicate without everyone seeing what they&#39;re saying.

How important can it be if you made 1 post and then need to pm someone already...?
I just think that the protection for abuse is more important then the possibillity and needs to use it immediately

[Sparkle1984]

Originally posted by jetje+7 January 2004 - 16:42--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (jetje @ 7 January 2004 - 16:42)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Sparkle1984@7 January 2004 - 17:19
I agree with internet.news, but I think the minimum should be set down to one post, because the PM system is an important part of a forum, if people want to communicate without everyone seeing what they&#39;re saying.

How important can it be if you made 1 post and then need to pm someone already...?
I just think that the protection for abuse is more important then the possibillity and needs to use it immediately [/b][/quote]
A person with one post might not need to send someone else a PM, but what if they wanted to read a PM that someone else has sent them?
I think that everybody should be allowed to read their own PMs, even if you aren&#39;t allowed to actually send any of their own until they reach a post-count of 6.