Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 41

Thread: Maximum Pc

  1. #21
    Poster
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Greenock, Scotland
    Posts
    2,646
    Originally posted by ROSSCO_2004+12 March 2004 - 03:28--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (ROSSCO_2004 @ 12 March 2004 - 03:28)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
    Originally posted by bigdawgfoxx@11 March 2004 - 23:24
    <!--QuoteBegin-stupidguy
    @11 March 2004 - 22:23
    I&#39;ve been lookin at some reviews with benchmarks etc and it seems the IntelŪ PentiumŪ 4 Processor with HT Technology Extreme Edition(3.4GHz easily overclockable to 3.8) is the fastest processor in the world so umm... Yep.

    It is

    But cost like 800 bux...i dont realy count that as a mainstream pc cpu haha
    true i agree...how much could an fx-51 overclock? since its around the price of a p4 3.2ghz then if it was more overclockable it would be the best processor. [/b][/quote]
    Not much, I think tomshardware tried to oc it abit but didn&#39;t get very high.

  2. Software & Hardware   -   #22
    group&nbsp; everybody

    Lets have a big group hug.
    <span style='color:blue'><span style='font-family:Arial'>Msi ms-6330
    Amd Athlon at 1ghz
    896mb Ram pc-133
    Seagate 80gb 7,200 rpm
    Nvidia Geforce MX 420
    21 inch screen
    MSI 52X32X52 CD-RW (cr52-m)
    SoundBlaster 5.1 mp3+
    Creative Labs 5.1 Speakers
    Xp Pro Sp1</span></span>

  3. Software & Hardware   -   #23
    Poster
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Greenock, Scotland
    Posts
    2,646
    Okay.

  4. Software & Hardware   -   #24
    _John_Lennon_'s Avatar Poster
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Strawberry Fields
    Posts
    1,176
    You know, if I had like 7k to spend on a kick ass computer, I still wouldnt get the P4EE&#39;s.

    I would get one Fx-51 probably, and then several 64 bit machines.

  5. Software & Hardware   -   #25
    Poster
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Greenock, Scotland
    Posts
    2,646
    Originally posted by _John_Lennon_@12 March 2004 - 03:50
    You know, if I had like 7k to spend on a kick ass computer, I still wouldnt get the P4EE&#39;s.

    I would get one Fx-51 probably, and then several 64 bit machines.
    Reason?

  6. Software & Hardware   -   #26
    tesco's Avatar woowoo
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Canadia
    Posts
    21,669
    Originally posted by stupidguy+11 March 2004 - 23:51--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (stupidguy @ 11 March 2004 - 23:51)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-_John_Lennon_@12 March 2004 - 03:50
    You know, if I had like 7k to spend on a kick ass computer, I still wouldnt get the P4EE&#39;s.

    I would get one Fx-51 probably, and then several 64 bit machines.
    Reason? [/b][/quote]
    intels a peice lol... no j/k, amd&#39;s are 64bit so they&#39;re uhh...better...will have support of future 64bit stuff...

  7. Software & Hardware   -   #27
    _John_Lennon_'s Avatar Poster
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Strawberry Fields
    Posts
    1,176
    because you wont notice any different between a P4EE with 4GB&#39;s of ram, and a FX-51 with maybe 2 GB&#39;s tops.

    Except a good several hundred dollars.

    Besdies, you the top of the line computer really arnt seperated by that much, I would much rather have several 64 bit 3200+ machines networked for some kick ass LANing, and folding of course, than one or two expensive monstrosities.

    Wouldnt you?

  8. Software & Hardware   -   #28
    Poster
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Greenock, Scotland
    Posts
    2,646
    Originally posted by _John_Lennon_@12 March 2004 - 03:54
    because you wont notice any different between a P4EE with 4GB&#39;s of ram, and a FX-51 with maybe 2 GB&#39;s tops.

    Except a good several hundred dollars.

    Besdies, you the top of the line computer really arnt seperated by that much, I would much rather have several 64 bit 3200+ machines networked for some kick ass LANing, and folding of course, than one or two expensive monstrosities.

    Wouldnt you?
    If I had that much money... No. I&#39;d want the highest priced of everything I could find.

  9. Software & Hardware   -   #29
    tesco's Avatar woowoo
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Canadia
    Posts
    21,669
    Originally posted by stupidguy+12 March 2004 - 00:06--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (stupidguy @ 12 March 2004 - 00:06)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-_John_Lennon_@12 March 2004 - 03:54
    because you wont notice any different between a P4EE with 4GB&#39;s of ram, and a FX-51 with maybe 2 GB&#39;s tops.

    Except a good several hundred dollars.

    Besdies, you the top of the line computer really arnt seperated by that much, I would much rather have several 64 bit 3200+ machines networked for some kick ass LANing, and folding of course, than one or two expensive monstrosities.

    Wouldnt you?
    If I had that much money... No. I&#39;d want the highest priced of everything I could find. [/b][/quote]
    and that is why u dont have much money...you waste what you do have and it never gets saved up...

  10. Software & Hardware   -   #30
    Poster
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Greenock, Scotland
    Posts
    2,646
    Originally posted by ROSSCO_2004+12 March 2004 - 04:09--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (ROSSCO_2004 &#064; 12 March 2004 - 04:09)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
    Originally posted by stupidguy@12 March 2004 - 00:06
    <!--QuoteBegin-_John_Lennon_
    @12 March 2004 - 03:54
    because you wont notice any different between a P4EE with 4GB&#39;s of ram, and a FX-51 with maybe 2 GB&#39;s tops.

    Except a good several hundred dollars.

    Besdies, you the top of the line computer really arnt seperated by that much, I would much rather have several 64 bit 3200+ machines networked for some kick ass LANing, and folding of course, than one or two expensive monstrosities.

    Wouldnt you?

    If I had that much money... No. I&#39;d want the highest priced of everything I could find.
    and that is why u dont have much money...you waste what you do have and it never gets saved up... [/b][/quote]
    Waste it on what?


    Note: the " " smily implies that I am joking or laughig because I know what I have said is stupid.

Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •