Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 19 of 19

Thread: 64 Bit

  1. #11
    tesco's Avatar woowoo
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Canadia
    Posts
    21,669
    Originally posted by LSA+13 March 2004 - 13:03--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (LSA @ 13 March 2004 - 13:03)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Mad Cat@13 March 2004 - 11:58
    The first UT had Linux support, Epic is leading the way for Linux gamers

    CD3 of UT2003 contained the Linux installer for that too if you&#39;re interested.
    I would but:

    633MHz Celeron
    384MB RAM
    64MB Nvidia GeForce 4 MX440


    Tux Racer is kind of fun though [/b][/quote]
    one of my friends has the exact same specs encept for less ram, he has 256mb, and he was playing UT2003 fine.

  2. Software & Hardware   -   #12
    atiVidia's Avatar ^would've been cool.
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    1,522
    Originally posted by Mad Cat+13 March 2004 - 10:10--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Mad Cat @ 13 March 2004 - 10:10)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
    Originally posted by ROSSCO_2004@13 March 2004 - 15:01
    <!--QuoteBegin-Mad Cat
    @13 March 2004 - 09:40
    All you people that said, "Don&#39;t get 64 bit there won&#39;t be anything coming out for it," can eat your own hats&#33;

    If one was to get a free 64 bit Linux distro, one could, FROM THE BOX, use a 64 bit version of UT2004, which actually gains 20% performance wise over the 32 bit version.

    are you gonna get it? let us know how it is.
    I&#39;ll clear off my old hard drive and do a dual OS boot once I find a 64 bit Linux distro to d/l, and have some bandwith free.

    Any Linux-ers out there, I could use some help

    EDIT: The game comes out on Marth 19th by the way. [/b][/quote]
    suse has several x86-64 distros

    link coming soon

  3. Software & Hardware   -   #13
    Poster
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    889
    Originally posted by ROSSCO_2004@13 March 2004 - 13:06
    one of my friends has the exact same specs encept for less ram, he has 256mb, and he was playing UT2003 fine.


    Did he get a decent FPS?

  4. Software & Hardware   -   #14
    atiVidia's Avatar ^would've been cool.
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    1,522

  5. Software & Hardware   -   #15
    Poster
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    889
    AMD 64 bit Gentoo

    http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/base/amd64/index.xml

    Not a beginner distro though

  6. Software & Hardware   -   #16
    bob_the_alien's Avatar Bob The Alien
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    London, Kentucky
    Age
    44
    Posts
    523
    I just can&#39;t wait for UT2k4 to come out, being playing the demo for a while now, and it&#39;s gotten me very addicted, but just sucks actually having to pay.

    As for saying not to buy, I don&#39;t think anyone was really saying not to buy 64 bit, just don&#39;t buy right now, wait for more programs and O/S&#39;s to come out that support 64, and by then the hardware would be cheaper.
    That&#39;s my plan, anyhow.
    "Where did he go, George, Where did he go?"


  7. Software & Hardware   -   #17
    Lick My Lovepump
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Age
    21
    Posts
    2,657
    Originally posted by LSA+13 March 2004 - 18:03--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (LSA @ 13 March 2004 - 18:03)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Mad Cat@13 March 2004 - 11:58
    The first UT had Linux support, Epic is leading the way for Linux gamers

    CD3 of UT2003 contained the Linux installer for that too if you&#39;re interested.
    I would but:

    633MHz Celeron
    384MB RAM
    64MB Nvidia GeForce 4 MX440


    Tux Racer is kind of fun though [/b][/quote]
    Ah come on&#33; The original UT&#39;s min specs were 200MHz&#33;

  8. Software & Hardware   -   #18
    tesco's Avatar woowoo
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Canadia
    Posts
    21,669
    Originally posted by LSA+13 March 2004 - 14:19--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (LSA @ 13 March 2004 - 14:19)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-ROSSCO_2004@13 March 2004 - 13:06
    one of my friends has the exact same specs encept for less ram, he has 256mb, and he was playing UT2003 fine.


    Did he get a decent FPS? [/b][/quote]
    ya not too bad better than we expected on medium settings.

  9. Software & Hardware   -   #19
    Poster
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    889
    Originally posted by Mad Cat+13 March 2004 - 14:55--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Mad Cat @ 13 March 2004 - 14:55)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
    Originally posted by LSA@13 March 2004 - 18:03
    <!--QuoteBegin-Mad Cat
    @13 March 2004 - 11:58
    The first UT had Linux support, Epic is leading the way for Linux gamers

    CD3 of UT2003 contained the Linux installer for that too if you&#39;re interested.

    I would but:

    633MHz Celeron
    384MB RAM
    64MB Nvidia GeForce 4 MX440


    Tux Racer is kind of fun though
    Ah come on&#33; The original UT&#39;s min specs were 200MHz&#33; [/b][/quote]
    I&#39;ve ran UT original on it, it ran great. Maybe I will try the linux installer and see how that goes

    @ROSSCO_2004
    I&#39;ll see if I can get it then

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •