I'm gonna say XP (and get shouted at for doing so...)
I'm gonna say XP (and get shouted at for doing so...
On a given day or given circumstance, you think you have a limit.
And you then go for this limit and you touch this limit and you think "Ok, this is the limit".
As soon as you touch this limit, something happens and you suddenly can go a little bit further.
With your mind power, your determination, your instinct and the experience as well, you can fly very high.
- Ayrton Senna, R.I.P.
alas 2000 has problems with mme extentions , always had and always will, windows 2000 was never realy ment for home users doing all the stuff we do , yes its great for network solutions and offices, but lacks mutlimedia extentions
xp was designed around win 2000, and includes 99% of mme required
win 2000 is quicker on older comps with less ram
but if you got a new comp with lots of ram , you cant tell the diff between 2000 and xp
go xp
2000 pro and xp pro a literally the same
woowoo
windows xp is my favorite by far, next is win 2000, then 98se, then 98, then me, then NT, then 3.11, finally windows 95. mac and linux I haven't really used too much so i wouldnt put either into my favorites. but I do hate windows 95 so that should probably be after linux for sure.
um , no i think not bulio2000 pro and xp pro a literally the same
XP is just less stable than 20002000 pro and xp pro a literally the same
Anything to back that up?Originally posted by Monkster@24 March 2004 - 23:36
XP is just less stable than 20002000 pro and xp pro a literally the same
On a given day or given circumstance, you think you have a limit.
And you then go for this limit and you touch this limit and you think "Ok, this is the limit".
As soon as you touch this limit, something happens and you suddenly can go a little bit further.
With your mind power, your determination, your instinct and the experience as well, you can fly very high.
- Ayrton Senna, R.I.P.
i guess he doesn't
lol yer and its taken like 4 sp to get 2000 stable,
ive been using xp for a long time now and have no problems at all , ppl usualy blame operating systems , when usualy its hardware issues
older hardware might not be compatable with xp and thus the drivers wont work correctly
i wouldnt say thats a problem of xp, more a case of get new hardware that works with a new os
Originally posted by delphin460@25 March 2004 - 00:40
lol yer and its taken like 4 sp to get 2000 stable,
ive been using xp for a long time now and have no problems at all , ppl usualy blame operating systems , when usualy its hardware issues
older hardware might not be compatable with xp and thus the drivers wont work correctly
i wouldnt say thats a problem of xp, more a case of get new hardware that works with a new os
you call that hardware issues?
Posting Permissions
)
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks