Page 3 of 12 FirstFirst 123456 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 120

Thread: Girl Charged With Child Porn

  1. #21
    Arm's Avatar Poster
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    a well
    Age
    36
    Posts
    1,437
    Originally posted by leftism@20 April 2004 - 18:00
    Thank God this "child pornographer" is going to jail.

    I'm sure the world will be a much safer place now. 
    You just broke my sarcasm meter. It was off the scale. Now Arm shall break yours.

    So, ah the jury aquitted her outta sympathy. Why not just aquitt R. Kelly and Michelle Jackson(or Michael. Looks like Michelle to me) because they are all a bunch of child raping fuckers who all need to be castrated and thrown into a big tank of acid.

    Just like the song I am listening to
    PAYBACKS A BITCH MOFHERTUCKER

    Ok I fucked that up.

  2. The Drawing Room   -   #22
    Originally posted by Arm+--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Arm)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
    <!--QuoteBegin-leftism


    Thank God this "child pornographer" is going to jail.

    I&#39;m sure the world will be a much safer place now.
    You just broke my sarcasm meter. It was off the scale. Now Arm shall break yours.

    So, ah the jury aquitted her outta sympathy. Why not just aquitt R. Kelly and Michelle Jackson(or Michael. Looks like Michelle to me) because they are all a bunch of child raping fuckers who all need to be castrated and thrown into a big tank of acid.

    Just like the song I am listening to
    PAYBACKS A BITCH MOFHERTUCKER
    [/b][/quote]

    What&#39;s the connection between "child raping fuckers" and this 15 year old girl?

    PS Jacko hasn&#39;t been found guilty yet.

  3. The Drawing Room   -   #23
    Keikan's Avatar ........
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Edmonton (Not Enfield)
    Age
    34
    Posts
    3,743
    Originally posted by vidcc@20 April 2004 - 18:22
    15 year olds today have the luxury of access to the internet which brings as many dangers as it does benefits. 15 year olds seem to be more worldly wise these days as well, even if the "wiseness" is often taken over by juvenile stupidity.
    I am probably the biggest anti child porn and anti peadophile person one could meet...i would if allowed burn off the genitals of peadophiles with a blow lamp, they are evil people that need to be removed from society ( i am not advocating violence or vigilante actions...just dreaming)
    Having stated my stance on this i have to say that this to me is more a case of juvenile stupidity than her being a child pornographer.
    She does need to be taught a lesson.....how that lesson should be learnt is the question and i hope if it does end up in court that the judge is a good one.

    all this aside what i would like to know is how this 15 year old managed to do this in the first place? I am not a great one for "blame the parents" every time a child does something wrong but to not control internet usage of one so young is irresponsible at the very least. My son is 16 and he isn&#39;t allowed unmonitored access ( my router has the option of mailing the log to me ) I allow him some slack but he doesn&#39;t get to use the net with his door closed.
    Ya but what are you worried about him accessing? Porn? He&#39;s 16 come on.
    Ohh noo!!! I make dribbles!!!

  4. The Drawing Room   -   #24
    Does anyone believe this is charge is worth pursuing?

  5. The Drawing Room   -   #25
    Arm's Avatar Poster
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    a well
    Age
    36
    Posts
    1,437
    Originally posted by leftism@20 April 2004 - 22:35
    What&#39;s the connection between "child raping fuckers" and this 15 year old girl?

    PS Jacko hasn&#39;t been found guilty yet.
    I fucked it up and couldnt come up with anything better. And there is no connection so trying a 15 year old girl with child pornography because of a self-made tape makes no sense either.

  6. The Drawing Room   -   #26
    vidcc's Avatar there is no god
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    5,606
    Originally posted by Keikan@20 April 2004 - 20:05
    Ya but what are you worried about him accessing? Porn? He&#39;s 16 come on.
    Hmm...are you a parent?

    So what exactly is this thread about?...a girl of 15 posting pornographic pictures of herself on the net.....do you think this would happen if her parents did as i do?
    I have kept a check on him always, i like to think i am a good parent. I don&#39;t particularly want him to look at porn, but it&#39;s only natural for a young man to be curious, he knows all about sex and has a healthy like of girls...he also has a healthy respect of them because i tried to raise him to be a gentleman and respectful. When he is an adult and has his own place he can do whatever he wants..until then he abides by my rules. I am not a tyrant, i do negotiate on most things and treat him with the same respect i like him to give me, but sometimes being a good parent is not about being too easy going.

    it’s an election with no Democrats, in one of the whitest states in the union, where rich candidates pay $35 for your votes. Or, as Republicans call it, their vision for the future.

  7. The Drawing Room   -   #27
    vidcc's Avatar there is no god
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    5,606
    Originally posted by Alex H@20 April 2004 - 20:12
    Does anyone believe this is charge is worth pursuing?
    yes ....she and all other underage persons need to realise that this thing isn&#39;t acceptable and if she gets away scot free it not only sends out the wrong message to other teenagers but it also has a dangerous knock on effect of youngsters being coersed into doing this sort of thing by unscrupulous peadophiles online and keeping it "their little secret". 15 year old girls like older boys, they have cars and a bit of money...15 year olds are also easier to coerse into doing things like this

    And no...this is more a case of juvenile stupidity so to pursue it as if she was a child pornographer is overzealous to say the least...but she does need to realise this is totally unacceptable

    it’s an election with no Democrats, in one of the whitest states in the union, where rich candidates pay $35 for your votes. Or, as Republicans call it, their vision for the future.

  8. The Drawing Room   -   #28
    masta.z's Avatar Canadian Scot
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    268
    Originally posted by vidcc+21 April 2004 - 02:58--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (vidcc @ 21 April 2004 - 02:58)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Alex H@20 April 2004 - 20:12
    Does anyone believe this is charge is worth pursuing?
    yes ....she and all other underage persons need to realise that this thing isn&#39;t acceptable and if she gets away scot free it not only sends out the wrong message to other teenagers but it also has a dangerous knock on effect of youngsters being coersed into doing this sort of thing by unscrupulous peadophiles online and keeping it "their little secret". 15 year old girls like older boys, they have cars and a bit of money...15 year olds are also easier to coerse into doing things like this

    And no...this is more a case of juvenile stupidity so to pursue it as if she was a child pornographer is overzealous to say the least...but she does need to realise this is totally unacceptable [/b][/quote]
    when she&#39;s 16 (in britain) she can have sex, she can videotape herself and her bf having sex and they can watch it all they want... but sending it to other people over the internet and it suddenly becomes illegal? somehow that doesn&#39;t make sense to me. If it&#39;s of herself then it&#39;s harming nobody atall, so why should she be punished?



    p.s. jackson is innocent

    Peace, Masta.z&#33; :music1:

    I&#39;m gonna buy a gun and start a war // if you can tell me something worth fighting for

  9. The Drawing Room   -   #29
    so what happened to the girl afterall ,

  10. The Drawing Room   -   #30
    vidcc's Avatar there is no god
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    5,606
    Originally posted by masta.z@21 April 2004 - 06:52
    when she&#39;s 16 (in britain) she can have sex, she can videotape herself and her bf having sex and they can watch it all they want... but sending it to other people over the internet and it suddenly becomes illegal? somehow that doesn&#39;t make sense to me. If it&#39;s of herself then it&#39;s harming nobody atall, so why should she be punished?



    p.s. jackson is innocent

    Peace, Masta.z&#33; :music1:
    as far as i&#39;m aware the age of majority is 18 in the uk...yes you can have sex at 16 but you can&#39;t see an X rated movie, you can&#39;t buy alcohol and you can&#39;t vote....and as far as i&#39;m aware you can&#39;t post pictures of yourself of a certain pornographic standard at any age in the UK without breaking obscenity laws.

    lets be absolutely clear here...being 15 is not 16 and certainly is not 18 as someone posted.....there is a definate line. A goal is not awarded if you hit the post in a game of football because it&#39;s "close enough".
    Nearly all teenagers think they know more about life than the older generations and think they are grown up, i certainly did. I know now that i was wrong to think that.

    it’s an election with no Democrats, in one of the whitest states in the union, where rich candidates pay $35 for your votes. Or, as Republicans call it, their vision for the future.

Page 3 of 12 FirstFirst 123456 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •