Sorry to correct you lynx, but I have to:Originally posted by adamp2p+23 April 2004 - 14:29--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (adamp2p @ 23 April 2004 - 14:29)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-lynx@23 April 2004 - 09:03
Let's see if I've got this right.
100+ fps, a speed which the human eye can't process, and they spot 1 frame which is out of spec.
Oh, and who are the accusers? Oh yes, ATI.
Do me a favour, it's absolute bullshit.
Driverheaven is the one who published these results.
If you take a moment (actually a few minutes) to read and interact with the entire article including the flash demos, and uncompressed images, you will see several instances where Nvidia's hardware produced images that are still not up to par with what currently available ATi hardware can produce.
What can we conclude from this? Well, a couple of things, that's for sure.
What this means in a game? Well for one thing, if you are getting 100 frames per second on a card that cost you over $400 USD, I am sure you would want every frame to be high quality.
In general, getting higher framerates of lower quality images does not equate to a better gaming experience (unless you are colorblind). So what? Well here is the real issue: when ATi releases its next generation hardware in a couple of weeks, and it can produce framerates at or equal (and possibly above or below by a few fps) the Nvidia offerings, folks will be sure to be looking at the image quality.
Nvidia has been hammered recently by the gaming community ([H]ardOCP, Anandtech, etc.) due to its hardware producing image quality less than ATi's hardware. So you can be sure folks will be looking and comparing this again. [/b][/quote]
sorry to correct you adam, but driver heaven is practically paid by ATI to fu<k nvidia up the @ss.
and dont wisecrack your bull in my face trying to achieve more ati converts. let the companies do that, not the customers.
hell, we havent seen any reviews from ati yet, have we???
HELL NO! so keep your smart-sh_t talking to yourself and stop posting one-sided topics in order to achieve ATI converts you low-lifed ATI employee!
any1 who advertises for any company is an employee of that company, even if they are not being paid. they are bringing in profit for the company, and thus are employees.
if u want to advertise and not be raped by other topic surfers, do it for BOTH major companies, not just the one who you *probably* work for.
now L-T-T-F-A, please.
oh yea and also, BULL SH_T! frames which are not up to par with ATI's current solutions??? ur eye has been trained, if not hypnotized, to only adccept the screens coming from ATI's cards. hell we can easily accuse ATI of having screens that are off compared to nvidia. HELL WE CAN SAY NVIDIA IS BETTER than ATI because several of the distributors offer KICKASS, LIFETIME WARRANTIES (24/7 365days from BFGtech, amazing rebate offers, and cards which are 20 bucks under retail).
btw ppl who play online generally set anything they can to the lowest (1600x1200 ut2004 with no FSAA and no ASF and ive fgot a kickass record.) ppl play their games online nowadays. they need high framerates so they can slaughter their opponents w/o lag.
lol id love to play my games in 2048 x 1536
oh, yes, and like lynx, i am an nVidia fanboy because ATI cant f__king wire their hardware properly to work on every goddamned machine, unlike nvidia cards which many ppl, if not every1, has no problems with in terms of hardware.
and another thing, i see nothing wrong with anything run on ATI's or on nVidia's hardware. and dont try calling my eye untrained. its prolly better trained than the ati-hijacked eye ur runningg on. i must admit that the fx series really did suck balls, but i find no flaws in quality whatsoever with either nVidia or ATI (counting the newest cards.)
Bookmarks