ok or-whateverurnameis
u obviously havent been reading the latest benchies.
for intel: HT wont matter at all once 64 bit XP hits the market
@ ffuuggssddss: wait a little longer for the newer a64s
ok or-whateverurnameis
u obviously havent been reading the latest benchies.
for intel: HT wont matter at all once 64 bit XP hits the market
@ ffuuggssddss: wait a little longer for the newer a64s
Is that when they chop his head off? Thats fucking nasty..i hate terrorist..there so fucking dumbOriginally posted by SingaBoiy@12 May 2004 - 21:44
64-bit 3200+ is still better then any intel chip.
I just watched that nick berg video. If I was face to face with those mother fuckers... id kill them as slowly as posible.
[SIZE=1]AMD 4200 X2 @ 2.65Ghz, ASRock 939-VSTA
1.75GB PC3200, 2 X 160GB Seagate w/ 8MB Buffer
HIS Radeon X800 Pro, Antec Super Lanboy Aluminum
Is that when they chop his head off? Thats fucking nasty..i hate terrorist..there so fucking dumb [/b][/quote]Originally posted by bigdawgfoxx+13 May 2004 - 12:37--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (bigdawgfoxx @ 13 May 2004 - 12:37)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-SingaBoiy@12 May 2004 - 21:44
64-bit 3200+ is still better then any intel chip.
I just watched that nick berg video. If I was face to face with those mother fuckers... id kill them as slowly as posible.
One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter.
how much crack did you smoke before you wrote that? [/b][/quote]Originally posted by apunkrockmonk+13 May 2004 - 03:19--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (apunkrockmonk @ 13 May 2004 - 03:19)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-orcutt989@13 May 2004 - 02:13
Amd is cost effective, yet if you are a consumer that likes to listen to music, edit photos, upload websites, design websites, run a virus scan, play multiple games, look at multiple browswer windows, you will find yourself getting caught with an AMD not being able to run multiple programs even though it has a good clockspeed.
i think SB is just proof that commercials work
great FTP site for awesome quality video clips
yeah, you have to sign up, but its worth it
I watched the video ohhh boy it was some nasty shiat.
Well it was revenge for the iraqies since of the embarassment of the prisoners.
P4 2.4C / 1024M / R9600XT 128M / 80GB / 400W
Peer-to-peer Programs...
Clearly you are an alien.Originally posted by orcutt989@12 May 2004 - 19:13
Amd is cost effective, yet if you are a consumer that likes to listen to music, edit photos, upload websites, design websites, run a virus scan, play multiple games, look at multiple browswer windows, you will find yourself getting caught with an AMD not being able to run multiple programs even though it has a good clockspeed.
Your race must be very advanced to multitask like that.
I look forward to evolving to your level.
Go with AMD...more bang for the buck.
Take the money you save and invest in good memory and a fast HDD.
Remember, it's not just the chip that makes for a fast, flexible machine.
"I am the one who knocks."- Heisenberg
what do u mean by newer amd's? Will there be a huge difference if i get one now then if i get one in 3 months?Originally posted by atiVidia@13 May 2004 - 04:40
ok or-whateverurnameis
u obviously havent been reading the latest benchies.
for intel: HT wont matter at all once 64 bit XP hits the market
@ ffuuggssddss: wait a little longer for the newer a64s
what do u mean by newer amd's? Will there be a huge difference if i get one now then if i get one in 3 months? [/b][/quote]Originally posted by ffuuggssddss+14 May 2004 - 18:02--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (ffuuggssddss @ 14 May 2004 - 18:02)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-atiVidia@13 May 2004 - 04:40
ok or-whateverurnameis
u obviously havent been reading the latest benchies.
for intel: HT wont matter at all once 64 bit XP hits the market
@ ffuuggssddss: wait a little longer for the newer a64s
the new ones will have a higher clock speed, and the old ones will have a lower price tag
the new ones will have a higher clock speed, and the old ones will have a lower price tag [/b][/quote]Originally posted by ROSSCO_2004+14 May 2004 - 23:03--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (ROSSCO_2004 @ 14 May 2004 - 23:03)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>Originally posted by ffuuggssddss@14 May 2004 - 18:02
<!--QuoteBegin-atiVidia@13 May 2004 - 04:40
ok or-whateverurnameis
u obviously havent been reading the latest benchies.
for intel: HT wont matter at all once 64 bit XP hits the market
@ ffuuggssddss: wait a little longer for the newer a64s
what do u mean by newer amd's? Will there be a huge difference if i get one now then if i get one in 3 months?
What i ment was, a noticeable difference in speed, im not really talking about the clockspeeds.... 3400+ -> 3800+ doesnt seem like a worthwhile difference. But yeah, prices drop =p
Bookmarks