1. Intel is alot more expensive. AMD 2500+ runs equivilent to 2.5 but with OC capabilties.Originally posted by SingaBoiy+18 June 2004 - 07:52--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (SingaBoiy @ 18 June 2004 - 07:52)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-haha21@17 June 2004 - 22:40
Why do people prefer AMD over INTEL...
Intel seems fast w/ FSB and 1mb cache...
Also ghz wise...
well I know there still stuck with 32bit but whats the diff please pro - cons.
AMD64
AMDFX
INTEL C
INTEL E
Why!
Well what processers do you prefer in amd?
not over 300 please!
Aswell as intel!
2. AMD currently has the chip with the biggest FSB with 1600
3. 2500+ has the most bang for the buck according to many in these forums.
Clocker and Rossco and few other im sure will be able to give you more in depth answers but those are the basics. [/b][/quote]
what 1600fsb!?
how come i see the 3000 w/ 400 fsb sooo... if i oc will it get hot?
sooo.... yeah....
i never oc besides video cards...
how to oc w/ athlon any article to read from?
and how to oc barton 2500 to 2.5GHZ!!! whoa...
Bookmarks