Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 12 of 12

Thread: Single/dual Channel?

  1. #11
    clocker's Avatar Shovel Ready
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    15,305
    So it wasn't just me.

    Good.
    "I am the one who knocks."- Heisenberg

  2. Software & Hardware   -   #12
    lynx's Avatar .
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Yorkshire, England
    Posts
    9,759
    I think it is mainly that the underlying bus structure and cpu chip simply can't handle the data flow. Remember that although dual channel effectively gives 128-bit bandwidth, the processor still only has a 64-bit data bus.

    The Athlon 64 (939 and 940 pin) chips seem to get much higher memory bandwidth with dual channel, presumably because the cpu chip itself has a 128-bit data bus.

    As for "more memory always gives better performance", this depends on whether you are using the memory you have at present. If not, Windows will simply use the extra memory as disk cache, and unless you are using a lot of disk-intensive processes the benefits are going to be marginal.
    .
    Political correctness is based on the principle that it's possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •