Justice Is Not Black And White

[Yogi]

BusyMan:

America is here for the people

You gotta admit, the man is an original...........


That quote is one of the most hilarious in ages.............


America...... for the people....


Maybe if you put "rich"in it..............


YoRichWithoutMoney

[J'Pol]

I believe that mods position is that the banning was for recidivism, rather than the seriousness of one particular crime.

In any worthwhile legal system, once guilt has been established then antecedents are taken into consideration.

I remain of the opinion that sam should be given one more chance. However this particular line of argument, as proposed in this thread is specious at best.

Oh and Apple Night has not officially started btw. Tho' it is Glasgow Fair Friday, so I may just be spectacularly drunk this evening.

[Yogi]

Originally posted by J'Pol@16 July 2004 - 19:31
I believe that mods position is that the banning was for recidivism, rather than the seriousness of one particular crime.

In any worthwhile legal system, once guilt has been established then antecedents are taken into consideration.

I remain of the opinion that sam should be given one more chance. However this particular line of argument, as proposed in this thread is specious at best.

Oh and Apple Night has not officially started btw. Tho' it is Glasgow Fair Friday, so I may just be spectacularly drunk this evening.

I would like to see your gimmicks though, J'Pol, esp. when spectacularly drunk....



Apples,


Yogi

[Illuminati]

Originally posted by Virtualbody1234@16 July 2004 - 17:50
You think i'm stupid? You should see my brother, he's really bent over.

Broken back?

[Busyman]

Originally posted by SensualBarfing@16 July 2004 - 13:22
BusyMan:

America is here for the people

You gotta admit, the man is an original...........


That quote is one of the most hilarious in ages.............


America...... for the people....


Maybe if you put "rich"in it..............


YoRichWithoutMoney

You missed the point as always.

But then again we miss yours all time.

(see previous post by Yostupidcomehere^)

In that case

Insert "The UK" is for the people if America doesn't do it for ya. You are off on a tangent.

[brenda]

Originally posted by J'Pol@16 July 2004 - 17:31
I believe that mods position is that the banning was for recidivism, rather than the seriousness of one particular crime.

In any worthwhile legal system, once guilt has been established then antecedents are taken into consideration.

I remain of the opinion that sam should be given one more chance. However this particular line of argument, as proposed in this thread is specious at best.

Oh and Apple Night has not officially started btw. Tho' it is Glasgow Fair Friday, so I may just be spectacularly drunk this evening.

I didn't mention bans or sams.

I wasn't really proposing a line of arguement either...... just musing.

Anyhoo I'm off to get incredibly drunk for free.

See you all later if i'm still alive.

Enjoy the GFF JP.

[Busyman]

Originally posted by brenda+16 July 2004 - 14:28--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (brenda @ 16 July 2004 - 14:28)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-J&#39;Pol@16 July 2004 - 17:31
I believe that mods position is that the banning was for recidivism, rather than the seriousness of one particular crime.

In any worthwhile legal system, once guilt has been established then antecedents are taken into consideration.

I remain of the opinion that sam should be given one more chance. However this particular line of argument, as proposed in this thread is specious at best.

Oh and Apple Night has not officially started btw. Tho&#39; it is Glasgow Fair Friday, so I may just be spectacularly drunk this evening.

I didn&#39;t mention bans or sams.

I wasn&#39;t really proposing a line of arguement either...... just musing.

Anyhoo I&#39;m off to get incredibly drunk for free.

See you all later if i&#39;m still alive.

Enjoy the GFF JP. [/b][/quote]
Dangnamit J&#39;Pol.

Were talking about it but were not talking about it, okaaaaaay?

[brenda]

Originally posted by Busyman+16 July 2004 - 18:42--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Busyman @ 16 July 2004 - 18:42)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>

Originally posted by brenda@16 July 2004 - 14:28
<!--QuoteBegin-J&#39;Pol

@16 July 2004 - 17:31
I believe that mods position is that the banning was for recidivism, rather than the seriousness of one particular crime.

In any worthwhile legal system, once guilt has been established then antecedents are taken into consideration.

I remain of the opinion that sam should be given one more chance. However this particular line of argument, as proposed in this thread is specious at best.

Oh and Apple Night has not officially started btw. Tho&#39; it is Glasgow Fair Friday, so I may just be spectacularly drunk this evening.

I didn&#39;t mention bans or sams.

I wasn&#39;t really proposing a line of arguement either...... just musing.

Anyhoo I&#39;m off to get incredibly drunk for free.

See you all later if i&#39;m still alive.

Enjoy the GFF JP.

Dangnamit J&#39;Pol.

Were talking about it but were not talking about it, okaaaaaay? [/b][/quote]


I wasn&#39;t honestly, I was just hypertheticalising (I so with that was a word) and musing.

[Yogi]

Originally posted by Busyman+16 July 2004 - 20:17--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Busyman @ 16 July 2004 - 20:17)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-SensualBarfing@16 July 2004 - 13:22
BusyMan:

America is here for the people

You gotta admit, the man is an original...........


That quote is one of the most hilarious in ages.............


America...... for the people....


Maybe if you put "rich"in it..............


YoRichWithoutMoney

You missed the point as always.

But then again we miss yours all time.

(see previous post by Yostupidcomehere^)

In that case

Insert "The UK" is for the people if America doesn&#39;t do it for ya. You are off on a tangent. [/b][/quote]



Yo Tangent SaysWho?????

[J'Pol]

Originally posted by brenda+16 July 2004 - 19:28--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (brenda @ 16 July 2004 - 19:28)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-J&#39;Pol@16 July 2004 - 17:31
I believe that mods position is that the banning was for recidivism, rather than the seriousness of one particular crime.

In any worthwhile legal system, once guilt has been established then antecedents are taken into consideration.

I remain of the opinion that sam should be given one more chance. However this particular line of argument, as proposed in this thread is specious at best.

Oh and Apple Night has not officially started btw. Tho&#39; it is Glasgow Fair Friday, so I may just be spectacularly drunk this evening.

I didn&#39;t mention bans or sams.

I wasn&#39;t really proposing a line of arguement either...... just musing.

Anyhoo I&#39;m off to get incredibly drunk for free.

See you all later if i&#39;m still alive.

Enjoy the GFF JP. [/b][/quote]
I do apologise, I just took the ingredients of

Mod + Criminal Justice System + Current Board Sentiment and spun your words, drawing my own conclusion on your meaning.

My reply however remains a fantastic one. Just ignore the whole sam / banning aspect and take it as a critical analysis of why the Draconian concept is wrong and that we should remember that law without justice is inhuman.