Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 27

Thread: The Media Uses Incorrect Grammar...

  1. #11
    Poster
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    853
    How about Bush always saying "nucular" instead of nuclear.

  2. The Drawing Room   -   #12
    Originally posted by DataMore@24 March 2003 - 05:05
    How about Bush always saying "nucular" instead of nuclear.
    thats funny. like homer simpson!

  3. The Drawing Room   -   #13
    Poster
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,882
    Originally posted by lil_z@24 March 2003 - 04:54
    no im too lazy. when they (news or whoever) refers to troops, they mean one soldier.
    dont lie!
    I don't lie. The media is completely wrong. Ask any teacher or professor of the English language. Bring a dictionary with you.

    As a matter of fact, I had an article (by me) published at my local newspaper about the word TROOP being used incorrectly by the media. This was back during the Gulf War. "The Grammar Lady" (a weekly columnist of the newspaper) agreed with me 100%.

    Now here is a tip. the Englih evolves with the times. The word "troop" may come to have a new meaning or usage. It has to be used incorrectly long enough and accepted, to be offically changed (except for ebonics, which is a joke).

  4. The Drawing Room   -   #14
    wow, u try too hard. so when they say troops on the news, how do u take it? u think it should mean 10 x as many actual people? weird.

  5. The Drawing Room   -   #15
    Poster
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,882
    Originally posted by lil_z@24 March 2003 - 05:13
    wow, u try too hard.  so when they say troops on the news, how do u take it?  u think it should mean 10 x as many actual people? weird. 
    I know that the media is screwed up, so I take it as "they mean it". Just like having a conversation with someone who speaks ebonic.

    Here is an example of evolving English. GET your old dictionary from the attic and look up the word "often". The "t' is silent. Because so many people have used the word incorrectly for so long, the 't" is no longer silent. So now both versions are acceptle. Real speakers of traditional language (who are usually noted as being quite articulate) will use the silent version. It is more proper.

  6. The Drawing Room   -   #16
    Poster
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    853
    So how do you say it:

    "Grammar errors" or "grammatical errors"?

  7. The Drawing Room   -   #17
    Poster
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,882
    Originally posted by DataMore@24 March 2003 - 05:48
    So how do you say it:

    "Grammar errors" or "gramatical errors"?
    The spelling is "grammatical", not gramatical.

    I guess I should use "gramatical errors"

  8. The Drawing Room   -   #18
    Poster
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    853
    I've already edited it.

    So it's the second one the correct one?

  9. The Drawing Room   -   #19
    Poster
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,882
    Yeah. I guess so.

    This is getting too much for me. I gonna go now. Coz I be tired.


    Good Night troopers.

  10. The Drawing Room   -   #20
    Poster
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    853
    The english grammar is nothing compared to the portuguese.

    Or the chinese... Or the japanese.

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •