Just for you Ruthie.Originally Posted by BigBank_Hank
Just for you Ruthie.Originally Posted by BigBank_Hank
If Michael Moore is logic, then the Sun goes around the Earth.Originally Posted by Busyman
Do you know everything? do you know 3% of everything? Could it be that what you don't believe in is in the other 97%?
likewise for the person he chose as his subject matter.Originally Posted by spinningfreemanny
I'm still waiting for your views on Bush and the 98 vote claim.... a classic in the standards that you accuse moore of
it’s an election with no Democrats, in one of the whitest states in the union, where rich candidates pay $35 for your votes. Or, as Republicans call it, their vision for the future.
Originally Posted by BigBank_Hank
Answer the question though
Originally Posted by vidcc
Being not well read in the claim...I would ask a few questions.
Did Kerry say yea 98 times in the support of tax increases?
and was the quote "He voted 98 times to increase tax"?
If he did indeed say yea 98 times then I don't see the fault. If he didn't then the claim is inaccurate.
Do you know everything? do you know 3% of everything? Could it be that what you don't believe in is in the other 97%?
Be prepared Manny. I foresee a barrage from Factcheck.org on the horizon.
Well I read the campaign statement and it seems accurate...
Campaign statement
Do you know everything? do you know 3% of everything? Could it be that what you don't believe in is in the other 97%?
How can you make a proper decision on voting if you don't check up on statements made about the opponents of each candidate?Originally Posted by spinningfreemanny
http://www.factcheck.org/article247.html
please read the article manny as i feel that you are getting all your imformation about kerry from the Bush campaign. While you are on the site feel free to check out Kerry's spins.... This is the site that cheney ment to point everyone to...it is truthful and non biased.
@ Hank..perhaps you would prefer me to point to kerry's website.. so you could say it was a biased stance...please read it as well.
I am not trying to get you to change you mind about who to vote for, what i am trying to do is get you to look at the validity of the reasons given to not vote for someone.
I chose tax in this example but i could go to many...it also puts a question mark over the accusation of kerry being a "flip flopper"...his record actually shows that his past backs up what he proposes for the future. We hear Bush say "you can run but you can't hide"...well i wish Kerry would come out and say..."here is my record" because agree with his policy or not he has nothing to hide...his record reflects what he is telling us
What i am saying is don't rely on Bush to give you the facts about kerry, also don't rely on bush to give you the full story of his manifesto
Likewise don't rely on kerry for bush facts (but then i know you don't believe a word he says)
it’s an election with no Democrats, in one of the whitest states in the union, where rich candidates pay $35 for your votes. Or, as Republicans call it, their vision for the future.
Originally Posted by spinningfreemannyWell check the facts...not what Bush tell youOriginally Posted by vidcc
it’s an election with no Democrats, in one of the whitest states in the union, where rich candidates pay $35 for your votes. Or, as Republicans call it, their vision for the future.
well, he acted like a typical liberal 350 times. I wonder how he compares to others in the senate?
Now I will gladly state that there are misrepresntations on both sides as I am learning are a simple part of politics. You will never see me concide that Kerry is decisive though; He is a Clinton poll politician to the core.
Do you know everything? do you know 3% of everything? Could it be that what you don't believe in is in the other 97%?
Bookmarks