fdisk, where can i downlaod it?

[Samurai]

Yes you'll lose the data... So backup anything you want to keep.

Have you gone into Disk Management to see what shows up there?

------

And about the first topic of this thread... Try: http://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&q=...ad+fdisk&meta=

Oooh shows 58.32gb unallocated, with an option to partition. if i do this will i lose any data on my original partition?

[Smurfette]

]
<nitpick>
There is always at least one partition.
You can't install an OS or create a file system (FAT32 or NTFS) without partitioning the drive first.
Even if C: occupies the entire hard disk, it'll still use a partition.
</nitpick>

<anti-nitpick>not if its a slave drive </anti-nitpick>

How does that change things? If you single-partition a HDD as a boot drive, then a year later move it and make it a slave, does that mean that it's not partitioned any more?

[Virtualbody1234]

Oooh shows 58.32gb unallocated, with an option to partition. if i do this will i lose any data on my original partition?

Great news!

No you won't lose data if you add a partiton in that unallocated space. Go for it.

[Samurai]

Great news!

No you won't lose data if you add a partiton in that unallocated space. Go for it.

Thank you for all your help VB. Appreciated :beerchug:

[fkdup74]

How does that change things? If you single-partition a HDD as a boot drive, then a year later move it and make it a slave, does that mean that it's not partitioned any more?

it was a brand new fucking drive,
read before you make an ass outta yourself
can you not fresh install a salve and have it unallocated?
hey , or any drive for that matter,
they dont format em at the factory last i checked

anyway, glad ya got it sorted samurai

[Smurfette]

it was a brand new fucking drive,
read before you make an ass outta yourself
can you not fresh install a salve and have it unallocated?
hey , or any drive for that matter,
they dont format em at the factory last i checked

Hey, I'll tell you what, why don't you answer the question before talking unrelated shit you brainless fuckwit?

Here, have another go...

]<nitpick>
There is always at least one partition.
You can't install an OS or create a file system (FAT32 or NTFS) without partitioning the drive first.
Even if C: occupies the entire hard disk, it'll still use a partition.
</nitpick>

<anti-nitpick>not if its a slave drive </anti-nitpick>

How does that change things? If you single-partition a HDD as a boot drive, then a year later move it and make it a slave, does that mean that it's not partitioned any more?

[Virtualbody1234]

About this [NITPICK] argument...

A drive that is new or Master or Slave has nothing to do with partition(s).

Any drive needs at least 1 partition before data can be stored on it.


------------
I'm glad it's sorted, Samurai.

[Samurai]

anyway, glad ya got it sorted samurai

I'm glad it's sorted, Samurai.

Thank you both

[fkdup74]

Hey, I'll tell you what, why don't you answer the question before talking unrelated shit you brainless fuckwit?

had it been a half ass intelligent question...
i may have
why dont you STFU and go back to smurfland

[Smurfette]

had it been a half ass intelligent question...
i may have
why dont you STFU and go back to smurfland

<nitpick>
It's half-assed
</nitpick>
Perhaps I should've used shorter sentences then...


@VB:
It's not an argument - fuckedup would need to actually argue for that.