What features does the free version lack?Originally Posted by Formula1
IMO Bittorent is shit as a protocol, so I always steer clear of it...
What's the point of warezing something you can get from the actual developers?
What features does the free version lack?
IMO Bittorent is shit as a protocol, so I always steer clear of it...
What's the point of warezing something you can get from the actual developers?
Poster
No it isnt a paradox, i'm serious. Anyways you can find the latest/retail version of Nero burning rom at suprnova.org , and just about any/most retail version of a program on there.i sthat a paradox?
Xenu
Bittorrent may be a "shit" protocol, whatever that means, but it is getting to be
the most popular, if its not that allready. I read somewhere that torrents are
responsible of 1/3 of the traffic on the net. How did they measure I dont know...
If the free version of Nero lacks some features thats the reason to "warezing".
If there'sa naggin screen and/or 30day trial thats another reason for teh "warezing".
I dont know as i've downed the cracked versions with torrents a looong time.
So im just guessing here.
Spoiler: Show
Why warez it when you can get it from the devs?
Poster
I havent tried that free version. But how come the trialvserion ( http://www.nero.com/us/neroue-prog.php ) is a 10 mb download , and the retail is around 87 mb ? The reason to warez something rather than get a trial from the actual devlopers is usually because most developers leave out some of the good features, and of course it isnt free if you are looking for the whole thing . And I really don't unserstand the protocol issue of BT , but anyways BT works excellent for me. So my 2 cents
Edit: Added-and of course it isnt free if you are looking for the whole thing from the developers, but it is on warez
Last edited by Formula1; 12-03-2004 at 08:01 PM.
Xenu
Why get it from Dev if you can get it cracked?
Spoiler: Show
Responsible for 1/3 of the traffic because it's such an inefficient protocol. How much of the traffic is data to and from the trackers and not data to and from the users?Bittorrent may be a "shit" protocol, whatever that means, but it is getting to be
the most popular, if its not that allready. I read somewhere that torrents are
responsible of 1/3 of the traffic on the net. How did they measure I dont know...
If the free version of Nero lacks some features thats the reason to "warezing".
If there'sa naggin screen and/or 30day trial thats another reason for teh "warezing".
I dont know as i've downed the cracked versions with torrents a looong time.
So im just guessing here.
The second link i posted was a pseudo link to a serial. I'd rather use a serial than download a crack from suprnova knowing the troubles they've had in the past with security...
edit: been typing "date" too much recently
Last edited by Tifosi; 12-03-2004 at 08:02 PM.
Because it doesn't need cracked
Xenu
Maybe so. Im talking about content.Because it doesn't need cracked
The packs from the Devs dont have the other goodies
what I like. In most cases i got "more" fromthe cracked than the fromDevs.
Actually, I got the Extras for the Nero, all I need is to update Nero itself,
which I think its not needed in every minor release. They're just updating
for more CD/DVD rom support and unsupport for someserials, perhaps.
And, I got me a legit 5.5 version which im a bout to install next time im
re-installing teh XP. I've heard ppl complaing their burned DVD fails with
some nero 6.xx programs. i want to see if the 5.5 works betteralso because my
dvd-rw has some difficulties also.
Either way. We're both are right, right?
Spoiler: Show
IndeedMaybe so. Im talking about content.
The packs from the Devs dont have the other goodies
what I like. In most cases i got "more" fromthe cracked than the fromDevs.
Actually, I got the Extras for the Nero, all I need is to update Nero itself,
which I think its not needed in every minor release. They're just updating
for more CD/DVD rom support and unsupport for someserials, perhaps.
And, I got me a legit 5.5 version which im a bout to install next time im
re-installing teh XP. I've heard ppl complaing their burned DVD fails with
some nero 6.xx programs. i want to see if the 5.5 works betteralso because my
dvd-rw has some difficulties also.
Either way. We're both are right, right?
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks