Quite obviously, the above was a reference to the House Of LordsOriginally Posted by Busyman
..........
effendi
Quite obviously, the above was a reference to the House Of Lords..........
I plan on beating him to death with his kids. I'll use them as a bludgeon on his face. -
--Good for them if they survive.
Use Logic Or STFU!!!
Not obvious...but I do "get it" now especially in context with the next sentence.Quite obviously, the above was a reference to the House Of Lords
Maybe the misplaced comma made the difference.
Silly bitch, your weapons cannot harm me. Don't you know who I am? I'm the Juggernaut, Bitchhhh!
Flies Like An Arrow, Flies Like An Apple
---12323---4552-----
2133--STRENGTH--8310
344---5--5301---3232
.
Well, you know what to do about that.Washington D.C. residents can't even elect a congressman ffs.
No taxation without representation or some such.
The House of Lords is the "revising chamber", so no bills actually originate there.
It is supposedly in the process of being reformed, but the government has got to the stage where it cannot justify a wholly appointed chamber, but it does not want a second elected chamber since that would give it too much legitimate power compared to the House of Commons.
So currently the government is effectively suppressing any further changes.
.Political correctness is based on the principle that it's possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.
there is no god
you are correct about the main legislative work done in the lords, however bills can be initiated from the house of lords, but they do have to go through the same process as bills that start in the commons to be passed.
from the House of lords website
it’s an election with no Democrats, in one of the whitest states in the union, where rich candidates pay $35 for your votes. Or, as Republicans call it, their vision for the future.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks