[spd]

[manker]

Quite, it's sigworthyness is beyond question

[manker]

Reply to the edit as well

Very unbiased effort, stanker, seeing that he was responding to some crap that you posted....

No shit, really, do you think that may have had some bearing on my reply. Thanks again, cptn_obvious

[Busyman]

Reply to the edit as well No shit, really, do you think that may have had some bearing on my reply. Thanks again, cptn_obvious

Just doing my share to help out.

[hobbes]

I don't think it's one of your better written posts, hobbes. Overall it's rather choppy so doesn't flow at all well.

Yeah, that was my, oh so subtle, point, why use such mediocrity as a sig. It is drab, it's shout of controversy is barely audible and the topic itself is both trivial and mundane.

Despite these drawbacks, I think the reader can sense that this is just the tip of the iceberg for this author. A mere hiccup, or cough which precedes a flowing litany, which is not just wise but figuratively bursts with a stylistic flavor which satisfies even the most discriminating auditory palettes.

Something like:

spyderdudE sUks cAwk!

[manker]

Yeah, that was my, oh so subtle, point, why use such mediocrity as a sig. It is drab, it's shout of controversy is barely audible and the topic itself is both trivial and mundane.

Really!!11

My own motivation is contained in the parody at the end of the initial post.

Despite these drawbacks, I think the reader can sense that this is just the tip of the iceberg for this author. A mere hiccup, or cough which precedes a flowing litany, which is not just wise but figuratively bursts with a stylistic flavor which satisfies even the most discriminating auditory palettes.

Something like:

spyderdudE sUks cAwk!

[hobbes]

I know, you know. I'm just not sure that you know that I know that you know. Get my point?

[Spider_dude]

OmFg I LoVe Da Intorweb