The US invades Iraq, terminates Hussein and after a 6 month stay to allow the construction of a new democratic regime quietly leaves Iraq.
During this time they allow the UN to inspect Iraq for weapons of mass destruction. The inspectors find unequivical physical evidence (not papers describing their construction). Chemical weapons are also discovered (like the mustard gas and cyanide found in the Euphrates river yesterday).
In addition, links to share these weapons with terrorist groups are found.
Bush says: "I told you they had them, I told you they were an international threat, I took care of the problem.
Let us forget those people who will never beleive. We show them a nuclear reactor covered in anthrax, they call it a "Hollywood production".
And those on the other side, who will take a goat in the field with the words "nuclear bomb" (in English) spray painted on its flank as more than enough hard evidence. Yep, I done seen a movie on this! Export an enitre flock of nuclear goats to the US, then once they start to grazing, Ka-Bloohey!
This post is for those willing to accumulate evidence and alter their thinking.
1) Saddam is evil
2) We want to liberate the fine people of Iraq
3) We will feed those who have been starved by their own.
4) We love babies and puppy dogs.
The above are political justifications, propaganda. I ignore this BS, it insults my intelligence.
If my scenario plays out, what now is your take on the war? This is the trust I am putting in my Government at the moment. This is what I require. I totally understand the doubts expressed by those in this forum, but I don't think you will be able to judge this affair until all the cards have been turned over.
If accomplished I think the US will really bolster its credibility and it will leave a postive impression on the Middle East, especially the people of Iraq. If this does not happen, what a disaster for America in all ways.
The war, once started, must be seen to it's conclusion.