My original title for this thread was...
Is it not hypocritical to use Firefox on a Windows OS?
-when Microsoft is the biggest software Monopoly in the World supported by a multitude of copyright laws?
Is it then, not being belittled...
The opposite OS is of course Linux which is free, open and could be regarded as a truly Democratic OS.
(sorry... never tried it..)
They say -it would be easy as a "Terrorist" to not only attack the U.S but the World simply by a script which melts windows on all systems using it
Ohhh the “drama" - live in fear - enjoy
You choose firefox
Cause its dynamic and supposedly more secure.
Security you say...
"Survival of the fittest” should ring a bell
- But doesn't that contradict everything we see in ads?
The mememememe want factor?
Should the software world want to be more "secure" - then -
Is it not best that there are Many different OS's, browser's, programs etc so that it becomes too complex to infiltrate the whole?
It's hopeless, sheep consumer whore society of freedom of choice, where my average friend regards me as a l33t just because i suggested using fx
as in farming, monocrops can be infected easily.
Isn't Life supposed to be Diverse?
drank a beer
smoked a cig
and as to the point of this post
here it is