It's full of stars

[Barbarossa]

Wow! Never realised you could make stars look so cheap and nasty!

[manker]

These stars are horrible. Also why has the criteria changed, it used to be 3000 posts for 4 and 5000 for 5 stars.

I don't mind having the stars, makes no difference and some folk seems to like them but aesthetically these ones are ugly. Can the other stars that Sam^4 made not be implemented?

[{I}{K}{E}]

These stars are horrible. Also why has the criteria changed, it used to be 3000 posts for 4 and 5000 for 5 stars.

I dunno that. already posted about this in the TC

[uNz[i]]

I now remember these stars. They were made to fit in with an IPB forum theme back when 7th was running the place.
The stars looked fine in thier original setting, but on VB they're a bit of an eyesore.
No disrespect intended to Newcster, btw. They just don't fit this forum is all I'm saying.

[sArA]

I think they are pretty...but then, if I wasn't a mod, I would probably only have 1 or 2

[Guillaume]

I don't want to start another "mods are big meanies" row, so I'll post it again.
And this time in simple terms so everyone sees it's not off-topic.


They serve no purpose (IMO) and are ugly, therefore adblocked.

[sArA]

I don't want to start another "mods are big meanies" row, so I'll post it again.
And this time in simple terms so everyone sees it's not off-topic.


They serve no purpose (IMO) and are ugly, therefore adblocked.

nah nah ne nah nah.....

I am surprised you didn't use the smilie.....

Really though, does it matter? What harm do they do? Why not?

[Guillaume]

Really though, does it matter? What harm do they do? Why not?

You mean apart from flattering the spammer's ego and probably start another batch of really useful posts like "OMG", "Roxxors" and "ROTFLMAO" all over the place?

[99%]

Change is good
keeps the members excited

[{I}{K}{E}]

/edit