Apologies, J2, it seems we have found another subtle difference in our languages. The American definition of refute seems to carry with it the burden of evidence but there is no such obligation in the English definition, it simply means to deny the accuracy of a statement. Given that difference in definitions it appeared that you were requiring him to provide proof of his innocence, rather than questioning my use of the word.
A consequence is that the bit aboutappears to apply only to Mr Galloway, since he is being required to deny the accusations against him and the members of the Senate committee are not (though perhaps they should be). I accept your assertion that it was meant to apply to all involved.Then all that is required to refute a charge is a categorical denial?
Does this occur as a courtesy, and only to oily politicians?
As to the subject of fandom, I've already stated that I don't like the man. But I like it even less when a group of bully boys start throwing around unsubstantiated accusations. I, like many others, applaud when someone stands up to the bullies. I suspect you've been known to do the same yourself.
You seem to think that's because it is at the expense of America, well I can only ask what it is that you think "America" is trying to achieve. I'm afraid it smells very much like another witch-hunt. As a nation you seem to be rather fond of those, yet they never seem to turn out well. I fear this one will be no exception.
Reply With Quote
Originally Posted by lynx
Bookmarks