You'd think that at 19 and 15 they could do it themselves.Originally Posted by vidcc
Go figure, retired boy.
You'd think that at 19 and 15 they could do it themselves.Originally Posted by vidcc
Go figure, retired boy.
lmao. i finished the vodka btw
No shit, where's the hairspray.Originally Posted by GepperRankins
does that contain alcolol?
It's volatile at STP, which must go for something.Originally Posted by GepperRankins
I assume the OH (hydroxyl) is there.
sexually transmitted penis?
i got rid of the taste then burped it back into my mouth
i think i'll give it ten minutes
Even money you'll wish you hadn't posted that.Originally Posted by GepperRankins
oops
what do you know. alcolol really does make you suck
at hand-eye co-ordination and such
at computer games, i mean
Frankly I would want the least amount of tax money and grief spent on a person like Timothy McVey and to have dropped his ass off "nowhere" and make sure he never leaves.
Everyone else in prison need to do hard labor or face some amount of minor torture as a deterrent.
There are prisoners so hardened that they stay in solitary confinement almost all the time.
There are folks that kill just to go to jail 'cause they get meals and a warm bed.
That needs to change.
I rather not have a death penalty and prefer exile.
Btw this discussion of "there is no such thing as no doubt" is bullshit.
If someone is sitting minding their business on live TV and a fella comes up and slits that person throat, he's guilty with "no doubt".
There are plenty more instances of guilty "on paper" but I think you all know that.
Many guilty verdicts that were overturned years later were shaky and convictions were simply 60/40 in favor of I believe he was guilty enough .
Silly bitch, your weapons cannot harm me. Don't you know who I am? I'm the Juggernaut, Bitchhhh!
Flies Like An Arrow, Flies Like An Apple
---12323---4552-----
2133--STRENGTH--8310
344---5--5301---3232
The "absolutely no doubt" as opposed to "beyond reasonable doubt" refers to the burden of proof.Originally Posted by Busyman
Would you kill a man based on television evidence. Are you 100% sure (not 99.999999999 etc) that what you see on TV is accurate. Are you so convinced that it couldn't be faked, that no-one could lie. Are you so convinced by identification evidence that you have not the slightest doubt of it's accuracy. Bearing in mind that absolutely means just that, no doubt whatsoever, no matter how small.
vidcc has already told us this, that he would kill a man, based on his confidence that your media report thing with absolutely no doubt. I'm surprised you feel the same way.
Bookmarks