have you watched the video?Originally Posted by Skizo
we want your oil!
have you watched the video?
Poster
Doubtful. If you watch the video then the terrorists win.have you watched the video?
mostly harmless
I haven't got time to watch the video, but I gather it's something to do with claims that WTC7 was deliberately demolished, with explosive charges that were planted prior to 9/11...?
But does it explain...
WHY?
(_8(I)
Yes. I thought that would have evident by my previous posts.have you watched the video?
The information I'm looking for is proof, not a conspiracy theorist yelling into a microphone on the street saying it to be so. Heck, I've seen the homeless doing that.
Last edited by Skizo; 08-08-2005 at 09:42 AM.
yo
effendi
I haven't watched the video either but that doesn't seem a pre-requisite in this thread.I haven't got time to watch the video, but I gather it's something to do with claims that WTC7 was deliberately demolished, with explosive charges that were planted prior to 9/11...?
But does it explain...
WHY?
I expect the charges were to ensure that the buildings fell in a regular fashion so as not to tumble into adjacent buildings, which would cause even more loss of life.
I plan on beating him to death with his kids. I'll use them as a bludgeon on his face. -
--Good for them if they survive.
Poster
That's not how the evidence was presented in the video though. Which suggests to me that you didn't watch it or that you are engaging in a similar tactic to that you deplore in that you are just shouting "Conspiracy Nuts!" at the top of your voice (perhaps into a microphone) as your only defence.Yes. I thought that would have evident by my previous posts.have you watched the video?
The information I'm looking for is proof, not a conspiracy theorist yelling into a microphone on the street saying it to be so. Heck, I've seen the homeless doing that.
Heck, I've seen children doing that.
Poster
Lamers.I haven't watched the video either but that doesn't seem a pre-requisite in this thread.
I haven't got time to watch the video, but I gather it's something to do with claims that WTC7 was deliberately demolished, with explosive charges that were planted prior to 9/11...?
But does it explain...
WHY?
I expect the charges were to ensure that the buildings fell in a regular fashion so as not to tumble into adjacent buildings, which would cause even more loss of life.
we want your oil!
one thing is, the building wouldn't have fallen. another is, like J2 said it would have taken quite some time to set it up to be demolished, so the charges must have been set before september 11thI haven't watched the video either but that doesn't seem a pre-requisite in this thread.
I haven't got time to watch the video, but I gather it's something to do with claims that WTC7 was deliberately demolished, with explosive charges that were planted prior to 9/11...?
But does it explain...
WHY?
I expect the charges were to ensure that the buildings fell in a regular fashion so as not to tumble into adjacent buildings, which would cause even more loss of life.
effendi
Quite. Altho' how can anyone be absolutely sure that they wouldn't have fallen.one thing is, the building wouldn't have fallen. another is, like J2 said it would have taken quite some time to set it up to be demolished, so the charges must have been set before september 11th
Maybe lots of tall buildings also have charges in them to detonate if they look as if they're about to fall into other buildings
I plan on beating him to death with his kids. I'll use them as a bludgeon on his face. -
--Good for them if they survive.
we want your oil!
maybe they do, if so why is no-one using this as a defense?Quite. Altho' how can anyone be absolutely sure that they wouldn't have fallen.
Maybe lots of tall buildings also have charges in them to detonate if they look as if they're about to fall into other buildings
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks