Lets get this straight once and for all, what are you exactly arguing about? The posts i made on this thread and the Gillian anderson boobs thread or the smutty PM 's manker is accussing me of sending?
There is no evidence smutty PM's were sent from my account to SGG, all we have is "hearsay".
Even when SGG told manker she wasnt even sure where the PM's came from manker was still convinced they came from my account, assuming there were smutty PM's in the first place. It seems strange for no evidence to be found on her account or mine. One thing i want to know is did she send any replies to the alleged PM's? if so they would have been sent to my account if they originated from me.
As for the posts in this thread and the gillian anderson thread, look at the context. If SGG was a minor then she should not have been taking part in these discussions because as IKE point out, they would attract sexually tinted replies.
In the gillian anderson thread all i replied to
her comment of "her boobs being bigger" than gillian's was "we demand proof". It was
after my post that manker pointed out she was 14. I didnt check back to see the reply as the fact no further posts made from me on this thread thereafter indicates. I'm not like manker, i dont live my life through this forum, i have a busy life in the real world and have real friends and girlfriends so dont have the same urge to read every post in every thread and to know everything about everyone here as manker does.
In this thread you can see all the posts for yourself and make your judgement.
If she was a minor then why did she make the posts she made especially considering her father is supposed to be here to lookin gat her activity, and in any case my reply cannot be considered by any reasonable person to be anything other than harmless.
Anyone having problems with what i posted on this thread should go out into the real world and find out what girls SGG age talk about, i have friends near her age so i know. If SGG found my comments offensive she would have complained, and would not have posted a pic of herself in her underwear if she was the type to be offended by such a harmless comment.
The thread i created for SGG was a long time ago, when i frequented this place more often. But at the time i made very many posts and created so many threads and was looking for anything interesting to post about.
I'm sure i was under the impression SGG was a gay guy or a lesbian (above the legal age might i add) who had a weird facination with japanese transsexuals, because her avatar had a pic of some japanese transsexual. This does not however mean i particularly cared to know her any better. She was just another of the many thousands of members who frequented this place.
Again i want to stress, look at what i actually posted (and not the PM's that have no evidence), keep them in context and make your judgement. Then look at mankers accusations i.e
Robert is a pervy letch who has a penchant for young girls
and see how they stack up with the facts. Manker has many friends here as he spends most of his life here, so you will find a great number of partizan comments.
However, those people who are actually interested in the truth should make their judgement from the facts as displayed and decide who should get a ban, me for the harmless comments or manker for the baseless but
very serious accusations.
@ 100%, in real life i have many female friends and the type of humor i have shown here they appreciate. I have never had any women complain, they sometimes call me cheeky but this is in good heart.
I admit some of what i've posted did not travel well in the typed form as it would have done if it were spoken to a real person but the intention was always there.
I think manker in real life has difficulty talking to women, perhaps if he were to use my type of humor with women in real life he would receive a negative riposte. There is obviously an element of jealousy there, whether its concerning women or money, because i have both (single at the mo and waiting for a call from missy
).
The problem isnt with the PM's or my posts, it is with manker. He is a pathetic person who really needs to get a life. Anyone who has been on this forum long enough will have seen our previous battles. His obession with the so called "pawnage" is no substitute for ambition and success. Is "pawning" someone winning an argument against them or is it the delusion of a win? If it is the latter then he has "pawned" me every time
.
I would like the mods to offer their comment on the matters raised here, only they can be considered impartial. IKE has kindly looked at the evidence and decided in my favour, as any other impartial person would have done.
The comment manker made
Robert is a pervy letch who has a penchant for young girls
has no basis. It is a very serious accusation and the mods should take neccessary action against him.
Originally Posted by Robert the pervy letch
At last we have someone who is actually looking at the evidence and making a judgement from that. But manker continues to make slanderous accusations.
. 
).
Robert00000
Its pretty much just a big telling of though.
Bookmarks