Show Your Pants - argument version

[Robert00000]

Thank you, Paul.

Obviously I don't have the ones Robert actually sent.

The date on the PM is the same as the date on this thread, Robert definitely knew how old she was and I definitely remember her saying that he was sending her smutty pms.

Regardless of any PMs - the fact that I'd told him before that she was 14, as did her Dad.

.

Here we go again, when will maker learn not to use the terms "actually" and "definately" without proof of me actually sending them or me "definately knowing or remembering her age"

When he says he and her dad told me she was 14, can he provide evidence of that?

When i post here i look at the contents of the message, i very rarely glance at who posted it, unless its missy or anyone else i have a connection with (either good or bad). It may be sad to say this but SSG isnt one of those who people here i take any notice of and I'm sure she probably sees or saw me the same way. She could have been just another anonymous poster as far as i was concerned.

[brotherdoobie]

Thank you, Paul.

Obviously I don't have the ones Robert actually sent.

The date on the PM is the same as the date on this thread, Robert definitely knew how old she was and I definitely remember her saying that he was sending her smutty pms.

Regardless of any PMs - the fact that I'd told him before that she was 14, as did her Dad.

.

Here we go again, when will maker learn not to use the terms "actually" and "definately" without proof of me actually sending them or me "definately knowing or remembering her age"

When he says he and her dad told me she was 14, can he provide evidence of that?

When i post here i look at the contents of the message, i very rarely glance at who posted it, unless its missy or anyone else i have a connection with (either good or bad). It may be sad to say this but SSG isnt one of those who people here i take any notice of and I'm sure she probably sees or saw me the same way. She could have been just another anonymous poster as far as i was concerned.

Unless she's wearing panties.

Peace bd

[Mr. Mulder]

too much talk, not enough pants

[manker]

Thank you, Paul.

Obviously I don't have the ones Robert actually sent.

The date on the PM is the same as the date on this thread, Robert definitely knew how old she was and I definitely remember her saying that he was sending her smutty pms.

Regardless of any PMs - the fact that I'd told him before that she was 14, as did her Dad.

.

Here we go again, when will maker learn not to use the terms "actually" and "definately" without proof of me actually sending them or me "definately knowing or remembering her age"

When he says he and her dad told me she was 14, can he provide evidence of that?

When i post here i look at the contents of the message, i very rarely glance at who posted it, unless its missy or anyone else i have a connection with (either good or bad). It may be sad to say this but SSG isnt one of those who people here i take any notice of and I'm sure she probably sees or saw me the same way. She could have been just another anonymous poster as far as i was concerned.

I definitely remember her telling me that you sent her smutty pms. That is beyond question. I definitely told you that she was 14, so did her Dad.

I can definitely provide evidence of this, I posted a screenshot of the PM, I can definitely provide evidence that I told you her age:

http://www.filesharingtalk.com/vb3/s...6&highlight=14

What I can't prove is that you sent the smutty PM. Only admin can do that.


I reckon that you did tho' - in fact I'm certain of it. You're a person without any social graces at all and you lech over the young girls on this forum.

I think you sending a smutty PM is far, far more likely than SGG getting a smutty pm of some other, random person who'd cloned/hacked your account.

[JPaul]

Thank you, Paul.

Obviously I don't have the ones Robert actually sent.

The date on the PM is the same as the date on this thread, Robert definitely knew how old she was and I definitely remember her saying that he was sending her smutty pms.

Regardless of any PMs - the fact that I'd told him before that she was 14, as did her Dad.

.

When he says he and her dad told me she was 14, can he provide evidence of that?

I think he did, when he said it. That constitutes evidence, people saying things.

So what we have is manker saying it, are you denying it. Did he not tell you she was 14, did Les not tell you the same thing

People can decide who to believe, manker and Les, or you. that's the way it works.

[Robert00000]

[QUOTE=manker]

I can definitely provide evidence of this, I posted a screenshot of the PM, I can definitely provide evidence that I told you her age:

http://www.filesharingtalk.com/vb3/s...6&highlight=14

What I can't prove is that you sent the smutty PM. Only admin can do that.

Most of us dont spent too much of our valuable lives on forums like manker does. Thats an obscure thread i just made a singular post on and probably didnt bother to check for any replies, I certainly dont recall seeing it.

So this does not constitue "telling me" anything if i wasnt there to see it. What manker needs to realise is "normal people" dont live their entire lives on this forum, its just a minor distraction from our daily or weekly routines. We socialise with real people and whatever is posted here doesnt bother us with any intensity.

Even if he did tell me her age and I actually read it, SSG isnt someone i would remember.

[missie]

Even if he did tell me her age and I actually read it, SSG isnt someone i would remember.

Give over, it does state her age in every post she makes.
You must have noticed that.

Although, I guess a busy person like yourself has no time to read trivial info like that.

[brotherdoobie]

[QUOTE=Robert00000]

Most of us dont spent too much of our valuable lives on forums like manker does. Thats an obscure thread i just made a singular post on and probably didnt bother to check for any replies, I certainly dont recall seeing it.

So this does not constitue "telling me" anything if i wasnt there to see it. What manker needs to realise is "normal people" dont live their entire lives on this forum, its just a minor distraction from our daily or weekly routines. We socialise with real people and whatever is posted here doesnt bother us with any intensity.

Even if he did tell me her age and I actually read it, SSG isnt someone i would remember.

Classic perv move...when their advances are rejected,the resort to indifference,slander...whatever diverts attention away from their
bruised egos.

Feck off cunt.

bd

[manker]

What manker needs to realise is "normal people" dont live their entire lives on this forum,

I'm the one saying for you to stop sexually harassing children, you're the one pming them with lewd remarks and yet you're the normal one.

I think I see a flaw in your statement.

Robert, absolutely no-one - at all - on this forum liked you to begin with. People thought you were a twat when you only posted in hardware and software world. When you started posting in the lounge, people started to think that you are a sinister, creepy, letch of a twat.

If you like to bombard women with sexual comments, that's a matter for you - the woman in question will probably call you on it and make you look small - re: the Lilmiss and goddess pwnage. This is hardly desirable behaviour on your part but is acceptable on some level, I guess.

Doing likewise to children is not acceptable. At all.

Stop it.

[JPaul]

The bit I love is where the guy who goes onto an interweb forum, to tell people he is a busy entreprenuer (sp), and who does a V Poor job of flirting with the female members of the forum (including minors), tells other people what constitutes normal.

Priceless.

Well mangep, at least you now know where you went wrong. Getting an education, running your own business, living with the woman you love, having wee manlet, living in a nice house (with a chrome bin), driving a nice car, meeting your chums of a weekend, playing sport, getting pished. You twat, what were you thinking.