Jaigandhi was too lazy to post but he wants to know which would perform better in games, etc.
His Athlon XP 2500+ which is OCed to 2.45ghz or an Athlon 64 3000+?
Jaigandhi was too lazy to post but he wants to know which would perform better in games, etc.
His Athlon XP 2500+ which is OCed to 2.45ghz or an Athlon 64 3000+?
btw its a 2500+M which is running at 2.45Ghz and the 64bit 3000+ socket 754 which runs at 2.0ghz
In 32 bit mode the overclocked 2500+M would be faster.
lol
Jeff Loomis: He's so good, he doesn't need to be dead to have a tribute.
This would......right? I thought more mhz = more speed.Athlon 64 3000+?![]()
I dunno. I'll shut up now. 16 yr old ROSSCO knows twice what I know and he's asking so...
(that wasnt meant to offensive ROSSCO, your OK in my book no matter what they say.)
Last edited by Skizo; 12-11-2004 at 10:28 AM.
yo
its an amd 3000+ runs at 2.0Ghz and i overclocked my 2500+M to 2.45Ghz so i have more MHz so mine is like a 3500+(i think)Originally Posted by Skizo
btw its fun being lazy..
btw im getting a 160Gb WD 7200rpm 8mb cache hdd today![]()
so 160+80=240Gb!!!! w00t! too much g1g4ness
Last edited by jaigandhi5; 12-11-2004 at 12:23 PM.
hey, i just told him that if it's purely 32bit software they're comparing then it's going to be the 2500+ OCed that will be better.Originally Posted by Skizo
![]()
he wanted to ask though.
Originally Posted by Skizo
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!
more MHz DOESNT mean more speed (unless its the same type of chip)!!!!!
why do you think an AMD 2600+ is called an AMD 2600+ and not a 1.95GHz?
its n00bs w0rld
im soo l33t someone stole my mhz!!!!111eleven11![]()
![]()
![]()
Bookmarks