Laws change.Originally Posted by JPaul
Is the Geneva Convention good forever or does it expire?
Laws change.Originally Posted by JPaul
Is the Geneva Convention good forever or does it expire?
Silly bitch, your weapons cannot harm me. Don't you know who I am? I'm the Juggernaut, Bitchhhh!
Flies Like An Arrow, Flies Like An Apple
---12323---4552-----
2133--STRENGTH--8310
344---5--5301---3232
Fair point.Originally Posted by Busyman
Is The Constitution good forever, or does it expire.
It's good forever but is changeable.Originally Posted by JPaul
How is a question 'a fair point'? Still unanswered, btw.
Over here we have the Patriot Act which would have to be re-upped.
Last edited by Busyman; 11-30-2005 at 01:45 AM.
Silly bitch, your weapons cannot harm me. Don't you know who I am? I'm the Juggernaut, Bitchhhh!
Flies Like An Arrow, Flies Like An Apple
---12323---4552-----
2133--STRENGTH--8310
344---5--5301---3232
Sorry, I thought you were being rhetorical.Originally Posted by Busyman
Does "It's good forever but is changeable." only apply to your Constitution, or can other people join in.
Originally Posted by JPaul
Silly bitch, your weapons cannot harm me. Don't you know who I am? I'm the Juggernaut, Bitchhhh!
Flies Like An Arrow, Flies Like An Apple
---12323---4552-----
2133--STRENGTH--8310
344---5--5301---3232
The USA was not the only country to fight the Japanese, yet we all treated them according to the Convention.Originally Posted by j2k4
The Convention not applying to everyone is something that your current administration has decided, and is not recognised as the legal point of view internationally.
Rather like the US/UK independantly interpreting UN Resolutions differently to everyone else in the Security Council...even though it is written into the rules that the Security Council as a whole interprets them.
Looking at it "Democratically"... 6% of the world population thinks it can do what the hell it likes, despite the legalities of the situation.
An It Harm None, Do What You Will
http://www.unhchr.ch/html/menu3/b/91.htm
link is the part of the geneva convention relating to pows
Not sure on the POWs of non signatories, Article 2 seems to indicate that in wars between two signatories any 3rd parties are covered, but for other wars non-signatories aren't covered. However Iraq is a signatory so its a moot point.
Article 4 seems to indicate that the Iraqi insurgents aren't POWs.
As i read it J2 is almost right for once.
Last edited by ilw; 11-30-2005 at 07:22 PM.
Such a shame what he said was irrelevant.Originally Posted by ilw
I believe, one way or another, that I have addressed the entirety of your concerns as they apply to my posting, JP, but as we've all witnessed, occasionally things can become somewhat confuzzled.Originally Posted by JPaul
I think I was exercising my right to meander a bit, as we seemed to be stuck on the point of "moral" or "not moral" as regards torture.
What do you desire I speak to?
"Researchers have already cast much darkness on the subject, and if they continue their investigations, we shall soon know nothing at all about it."
-Mark Twain
May you survive your impending personal shitstorm, my son.Originally Posted by ilw
"Researchers have already cast much darkness on the subject, and if they continue their investigations, we shall soon know nothing at all about it."
-Mark Twain
Bookmarks