For JPaul, especially...

[vidcc]

I don't believe a ban on abortion would result from an overturn of Roe.

Certainly, if this happens, there will be a variety of qualifications/restrictions/what-have-you, but I sincerely don't believe there will be an outright ban anywhere; in fact, in California, they'd probably make it mandatory, or at least give you a tax credit for doing it.

you don't think it will be banned anywhere

Some states legislators are even trying to make it a crime to assist a woman going to a different state to have an abortion.

But I don't want to go into that as it's just going to lead to covered ground about personal morals. I only raise it in reply.

[Busyman]

For the life of the flesh is in the blood.

Why the edit?

Why does it matter?

[j2k4]

Why the edit?

Why does it matter?

Because my e-mail notification includes your pre-edit post, and I wondered why you changed it.

You must have decided you didn't want an answer.

Never mind.

[j2k4]

I don't believe a ban on abortion would result from an overturn of Roe.

Certainly, if this happens, there will be a variety of qualifications/restrictions/what-have-you, but I sincerely don't believe there will be an outright ban anywhere; in fact, in California, they'd probably make it mandatory, or at least give you a tax credit for doing it.

you don't think it will be banned anywhere

Some states legislators are even trying to make it a crime to assist a woman going to a different state to have an abortion.

But I don't want to go into that as it's just going to lead to covered ground about personal morals. I only raise it in reply.

Some legislators?

Fear not, vid; such efforts will surely be met by referenda, then we shall see.

Anything else is posturing, as well you know.

[Busyman]

Why does it matter?

Because my e-mail notification includes your pre-edit post, and I wondered why you changed it.

You must have decided you didn't want an answer.

Never mind.

Your a sharp one.

I already know your answer.