Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 60

Thread: How to deal with Iran

  1. #31
    cpt_azad's Avatar Colonel
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Surrey, BC
    Posts
    6,646
    Hmmm, this can't be good

    linkage: http://www.shoutwire.com/viewstory/9...ve_Unstoppable

    TEHRAN (AFP) -

    A defiant Iran vowed that nothing could halt its controversial nuclear program, in a direct challenge to the UN Security Council that could risk international sanctions.

    With the country basking in national pride after regime scientists successfully enriched uranium to make nuclear fuel -- a milestone in its atomic drive -- officials pledged to move rapidly to industrial-scale work.
    "When a people master nuclear technology and nuclear fuel, nothing can be done against them," boasted armed forces joint chief of staff, General Hassan Firouzabadi.


    Iran says its nuclear drive is purely peaceful, but uranium enrichment can be extended to make the fissile core of a bomb. The Security Council had set April 28 as a deadline for Tehran to halt the ultra-sensitive work.
    "The West can do nothing and is obliged to extend to us the hand of friendship," the ISNA news agency quoted Firouzabadi as saying.
    US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice called for the 15-member Security Council to take "strong steps" and the White House said sanctions were now an option.
    "The enrichment activities by the regime fly in the face of the United Nations Security Council and the IAEA ( International Atomic Energy Agency) board," White House spokesman Scott McClellan told reporters.


    "There are a number of options that are available to us through the diplomatic process," he said, adding that officials were nonetheless still "pursuing a diplomatic solution".


    Iran's announcement is also a blow to IAEA chief Mohamed ElBaradei, who is due to arrive in Tehran overnight in a fresh bid to resolve tensions. He is expected to give his response in Tehran on Thursday.


    ElBaradei has said "the jury is still out" over the true nature of Iran's program and is also trying to press Iran to agree to a fuel cycle moratoruim while his frustrated investigation continues.


    Officials from permanent Security Council members Britain, France and Russia, and Germany, all said Iran had taken a "step in the wrong direction."
    Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov was however quoted as strongly opposing the use of force after US reports over the weekend suggested Washington was considering military action -- even a possible nuclear strike.

    "I am convinced that there can be no resolution of the problem through use of force... practically all European countries are in solidarity with Russia."
    The Israeli military's chief of staff, General Dan Halutz, described a nuclear Iran as "a threat to the whole world and not only Israel."

    The Jewish state -- believed to be the only nuclear armed state in the region -- views the regime in Tehran as its number one enemy, alarmed in particular by a call last year from Ahmadinejad for Israel to be "wiped off the map" as well as his dismissal of the Holocaust as a "myth."

    But Ahmadinejad repeated his call on foreign governments to "recognize and respect Iran's rights" -- presenting a fait accompli to Western powers which have been battling to prevent Iran from acquiring sensitive nuclear know-how.

    The firebrand president has also called for a no-holds-barred acceleration of enrichment work.


    Iran's nuclear milestone was achieved on Monday -- at a pilot plant of 164 centrifuges in Natanz -- with uranium enriched to 3.5 percent, or the purity required for civilian reactor fuel.

    This, said Iranian vice president and atomic energy chief Gholam Reza Aghazadeh, "paves the way for enrichment on an industrial scale" using an enormous 110 tonnes of UF6 feedstock gas already produced.


    He also said Iran was "determined" to complete work within three years on a heavy water reactor in Arak -- which critics say which could also produce plutonium for a nuclear weapon.

    Mohammad Saidi, the deputy chief of Iran's atomic program, told state television 3,000 centrifuges would be installed at Natanz within the next year.


    "The nuclear fuel cycle is complete, the beginnings of a powerful Iran," the conservative Iranian daily Resalat trumpeted, calling for a week of "national celebration" and a new annual public holiday to mark the event.
    State television was broadcasting non-stop images of nuclear sites accompanied by rousing patriotic music.
    Last edited by cpt_azad; 04-15-2006 at 12:22 AM.

    Jeff Loomis: He's so good, he doesn't need to be dead to have a tribute.

  2. The Drawing Room   -   #32
    I urge all of you to before accusing Bush administration [ ] about Iran and Iraq, what that dirty idealogies have done to the world... right from hitler to today's bush. http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...ge+2nd+edition
    and then decide. Bush is too good.. to be a president of great nation of America...

  3. The Drawing Room   -   #33
    cpt_azad's Avatar Colonel
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Surrey, BC
    Posts
    6,646
    Quote Originally Posted by akroracle
    I urge all of you to before accusing Bush administration [ ] about Iran and Iraq, what that dirty idealogies have done to the world... right from hitler to today's bush. http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...ge+2nd+edition
    and then decide. Bush is too good.. to be a president of great nation of America...
    I hate Bush as much as the next guy, trust me on this. But Iran should not be allowed WMD's for many many reasons (might I add in that I'm not too keen of Israel either, Palestine should be allowed to exist.). But it seems to have mellowed out. Let's wait and see what happens.

    Jeff Loomis: He's so good, he doesn't need to be dead to have a tribute.

  4. The Drawing Room   -   #34
    GepperRankins's Avatar we want your oil!
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    the suburbs. honestment
    Age
    38
    Posts
    8,527
    using nukes will kill thousands of civilians. kinda ballsucky if you aks me.


    the US has enough daisy cutters and bunker busters to make iran impotent with minimal collateral damage.

  5. The Drawing Room   -   #35
    There is not a chance in hell that the US is going to use nukes as a first strike capability. It's just not going to happen, to think otherwise is just ridiculous. But under no circumstances can you allow Iran to have nuclear weapons. At least not at this time. There are more convetional ways of eliminating this growing threat then jumping in with a megaton warhead

  6. The Drawing Room   -   #36
    cpt_azad's Avatar Colonel
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Surrey, BC
    Posts
    6,646
    Quote Originally Posted by calm2chaos
    There is not a chance in hell that the US is going to use nukes as a first strike capability. It's just not going to happen, to think otherwise is just ridiculous. But under no circumstances can you allow Iran to have nuclear weapons. At least not at this time. There are more convetional ways of eliminating this growing threat then jumping in with a megaton warhead
    Which will not happen just like you stated. The closest thing "nuclear" that the US might use is a bunker buster, that's about it. Civillian casualities will still be pretty high, something tells me that.

    Jeff Loomis: He's so good, he doesn't need to be dead to have a tribute.

  7. The Drawing Room   -   #37
    Quote Originally Posted by cpt_azad
    Quote Originally Posted by calm2chaos
    There is not a chance in hell that the US is going to use nukes as a first strike capability. It's just not going to happen, to think otherwise is just ridiculous. But under no circumstances can you allow Iran to have nuclear weapons. At least not at this time. There are more convetional ways of eliminating this growing threat then jumping in with a megaton warhead
    Which will not happen just like you stated. The closest thing "nuclear" that the US might use is a bunker buster, that's about it. Civillian casualities will still be pretty high, something tells me that.

    They will always be high in the middle east. It's not an accident that they place targets of importance in highly populated civilian areas. There concern for there citizens is staggering. You can run a terrorist cell from a mosque. But god forbid you shoot ast it to go after them in there.

  8. The Drawing Room   -   #38
    cpt_azad's Avatar Colonel
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Surrey, BC
    Posts
    6,646
    Quote Originally Posted by calm2chaos
    Quote Originally Posted by cpt_azad

    Which will not happen just like you stated. The closest thing "nuclear" that the US might use is a bunker buster, that's about it. Civillian casualities will still be pretty high, something tells me that.
    They will always be high in the middle east. It's not an accident that they place targets of importance in highly populated civilian areas. There concern for there citizens is staggering. You can run a terrorist cell from a mosque. But god forbid you shoot ast it to go after them in there.

    They've been using the "religion as shield" tactic for years now, so disgraceful.

    Jeff Loomis: He's so good, he doesn't need to be dead to have a tribute.

  9. The Drawing Room   -   #39
    thewizeard's Avatar re-member BT Rep: +1
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    6,354
    Once America realises that also other countries, have a right to nuclear energy...and whether we like it or not sooner or later they will get it; then the threat of nuclear attack recedes. There has only ever been one country on record to use such terrible weapons on human populations areas, now I seem to forget..who was that now?...

  10. The Drawing Room   -   #40
    j2k4's Avatar en(un)lightened
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Oh, please...
    Posts
    15,890
    Quote Originally Posted by thewizeard
    There has only ever been one country on record to use such terrible weapons on human populations areas, now I seem to forget..who was that now?...
    ..and thus we are forever precluded from commenting on the use of nuclear weapons by anyone (including ourselves) anywhere, at anytime, ever, ever, ever.

    Did I predict this?

    Why, yes...yes I did.
    "Researchers have already cast much darkness on the subject, and if they continue their investigations, we shall soon know nothing at all about it."

    -Mark Twain

Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •