Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345
Results 41 to 44 of 44

Thread: Should Canada Have Nuclear Weapons

  1. #41
    Mr JP Fugley's Avatar Frog Shoulder BT Rep: +4
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    7,880
    Who really did well after the second world war - The Japanese. Couldn't spend money on military development or upkeep, so spent it on developing their manufacturing infrastructure.

    Dominate the world car / electronics markets now. Didn't the good old USA used to do that.
    "there is nothing misogynistic about anything, stop trippin.
    i type this way because im black and from nyc chill son "

  2. The Drawing Room   -   #42
    peat moss's Avatar Software Farmer BT Rep: +15BT Rep +15BT Rep +15
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Delta B.C. Canada
    Posts
    10,547
    You forgot about the Germans , did n't do so badly either . Of course they over engineer everything away . In a good way I might add .

  3. The Drawing Room   -   #43
    j2k4's Avatar en(un)lightened
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Oh, please...
    Posts
    15,898
    Quote Originally Posted by Biggles
    Quote Originally Posted by j2k4

    Quite correct in all aspects (I appreciate your bent toward quality ), but, it must be acknowledged, great wads of money have been saved, and spent on other things.

    Is my point so objectionable as to be rejected out-of-hand?

    BTW-I wonder if, instead of Washington D.C. or Toronto, they'd consider blowing up Montreal?

    J2

    I do agree that we have spent less on defence than the US. Has this been to our advantage and US disadvantage? This is difficult to call in my opinion.

    The US has a considerable military industry that turns over a dollar or two for the US and employs a considerable number of people.

    With hindsight the USSR was less of threat than was assumed at the time. Also, we must regard the activities of the US in SE Asia. The US has been on quite a war footing for much of the post WW2 period and this also has contributed to its greater spending on defence than Europe. It could be argued that given our experience of the past we are a tad suspicious if our Governments start to flirt with uniforms and guns. So there is a political/cultural aspect to this too.
    Point taken.

    The need for eternal preparedness still exists, but the threats and logistics are much different than before the Wall came down.

    I don't think we need 50,000 troops in Japan, and 30,000 in South Korea.

    Bases need to be closed, etc.

    At some point regional powers have to do their own policing, right?

    The U.N. might find a useful function yet...
    "Researchers have already cast much darkness on the subject, and if they continue their investigations, we shall soon know nothing at all about it."

    -Mark Twain

  4. The Drawing Room   -   #44
    Biggles's Avatar Looking for loopholes
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Scotland
    Age
    67
    Posts
    8,169
    Quote Originally Posted by Guillaume
    No, no, according to official history, De Gaulle himself did that, armed with a spoon.
    I meant to say at the time, this really tickled my funny bone. Not sure why, but I thought it a beautiful counterpoise to the overall discussion.
    Cogito cogito ergo cogito sum


Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •