The later what?Originally Posted by Skizo
The later train.
It's hot in Topeka.
Ah, right. Thanks for that.Originally Posted by DorisInsinuate
but more americans have died and are at risk because of bushes actions
The number of American soldier casualties in Iraq over the past 6 years is still less than the total deaths from the last single day of terrorist attacks in America. (Sept.11)Originally Posted by GepperRankins
yo
it would be more or less zero if the war hadn't gone ahead, and there would be a hell of a lot less terrorist attacks planned against the west if it hadn't gone ahead. so, um, sucka my balls chiefOriginally Posted by Skizo
I wouldn't have taken it off your car...
I would have plastered it in these:
http://www.irregulartimes.com/sbest.html
I can't believe how idiotic that post is.Originally Posted by Skizo
Do people who aren't American soldiers not count then? How many of them have died?
"there is nothing misogynistic about anything, stop trippin.
i type this way because im black and from nyc chill son "
You're making the assumption that the war in Iraq was initiated because Saddam was a major player for Al Qieda.Originally Posted by Skizo
The fact that soldiers took control of and heavily guarded the oilfields and refineries while ignoring the numerous reports of insurgent attacks on hospitals tells me all I need to know.
There isn't a bargepole long enough for me to work on [a Sony Viao] - clocker 2008
Bookmarks