I'm more of a New Testament man me'self. The old one is full of the shedding of blood and the turning into salt. The new one is more about love and forgiveness. Christ's message as it happens.
I'm more of a New Testament man me'self. The old one is full of the shedding of blood and the turning into salt. The new one is more about love and forgiveness. Christ's message as it happens.
I think what everyone is referring to is that the death penalty is not more of a deterrent than life in prison so it is useless.
I rather not have it if there is a viable alternative. However, I agree that if you are going to have the death penalty, do it properly and in a timely manner.
Also, make the requirements in proof for it more stringent. A death sentence should require overwhelmingly compelling evidence.
Judge not, that you be not judged. For with the judgment that you pronounce you will be judged, and the measure you give will be the measure you get. Why do you see the speck that is in your brother's eye, but do not notice the log that is in your own eye? Or how can you say to your brother, "Let me take the speck out of your eye," when there is the log in your own eye? You hypocrite, first take the log out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to take the speck out of your brother's eye.
Matthew 7.1-5
You really are a nutcase kermit, you don't have an original thought of your own, all your authority comes from elsewhere. Baa!
The above recent posts demonstrate what I was talking about in the other thread.
Basically people cherry pick to suit their own "agenda" and therefore make their "own brand" of whatever religion they profess to follow. This isn't a bad thing of course because for the most part people pick the "good things" to live by.
But it can be. Examples of people following fanatic demagogues instead of the original profits can be seen worldwide and many have suffered because of it.
Back to topic
On the deterrent part would it be fair to say that no matter what one prefers (jail/death/work////////) any deterrent factor is at limited.
Would it be fair to say that as a deterrent one works better than the other overall (without stating which), but neither works for everyone.
Would it then be fair to say (ignoring morals arguments and concentrating on the deterrent factor) that having both options and the potential criminal has no way of knowing which will be applied should they be caught, could have more of a deterrent factor (limited) than removing one option.
Would it be fair to say that I am overusing "Would it be fair to say" in this post
it’s an election with no Democrats, in one of the whitest states in the union, where rich candidates pay $35 for your votes. Or, as Republicans call it, their vision for the future.
You quote Matthew 7:1-5 which states not to judge, but in the same post you judge me, you better head to the sawmill I'm sure they can take that log out for you.
I was not disagreeing with the charts provided, what I said was neither is a big deterrent. If it were then we would not need so many prisons.
Debt is Normal, Be Weird
Dave Ramsey
Can you Atheists make your minds up. One's saying we pick what we want and the other's saying we can't think for ourselves.
Try to be consistent ffs.
i agree on the death sentence for peodos,perverts and rapists.
"Researchers have already cast much darkness on the subject, and if they continue their investigations, we shall soon know nothing at all about it."
-Mark Twain
Bookmarks